IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v17y2013i03ns136391961340015x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Competitiveness: Comparison Of The Successful And Unsuccessful Eco-Innovators

Author

Listed:
  • HELENA FORSMAN

    (University of Tampere, School of Management, Tampere, Finland)

  • SERDAL TEMEL

    (Ege University Science and Technology Centre, Izmir, Turkey)

  • MARJO UOTILA

    (Finnish Science Park Association TEKEL, Vantaa, Finland)

Abstract

This paper examines the links between eco-innovations and competitiveness. It explores how superior competitiveness is created and how existing competitiveness is lost. The study utilises multiple case studies following the replication approach. The empirical evidence is based on five case firms that have created superior competitiveness and five case firms that have lost their competitiveness. Competitiveness is monitored having emphasis on market-related, efficiency-related, risk-related and image-related issues. The longitudinal data covers ten years from 2002 to 2011. This study provides two contributions to academic literature. First, it deepens the existing knowledge of how firms have created competitiveness through the development of eco-innovations or how the firms have lost their competitiveness. Second, it illustrates a journey of ten years during which the successful eco-innovators created their superior competitiveness. Also, the journey of the unsuccessful eco-innovators is described.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Forsman & Serdal Temel & Marjo Uotila, 2013. "Towards Sustainable Competitiveness: Comparison Of The Successful And Unsuccessful Eco-Innovators," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:17:y:2013:i:03:n:s136391961340015x
    DOI: 10.1142/S136391961340015X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S136391961340015X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S136391961340015X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ocde, 2008. "Réglementation environnementale et concurrence," Revue de l'OCDE sur le droit et la politique de la concurrence, Éditions OCDE, vol. 9(2), pages 191-272.
    2. Helena Forsman, 2013. "Environmental Innovations as a Source of Competitive Advantage or Vice Versa?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 306-320, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aastvedt, Tonje Marthinsen & Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri & Lu, Li, 2021. "Does green innovation damage financial performance of oil and gas companies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1368-1375, December.
    3. Johannes Heck & Mirko Meboldt, 2016. "CURRENT CHALLENGES IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES OF SWISS SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(05), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Magdalena Pichlak & Adam R. Szromek, 2021. "Eco-Innovation, Sustainability and Business Model Innovation by Open Innovation Dynamics," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Rogério João Lunkes & Fabricia Silva da Rosa & Januário José Monteiro & Daiane Antonini Bortoluzzi, 2020. "Interactions among Environmental Training, Environmental Strategic Planning and Personnel Controls in Radical Environmental Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Aleksandra Gąsior & Jakub Grabowski & Jarosław Ropęga & Anna Walecka, 2022. "Creating a Competitive Advantage for Micro and Small Enterprises Based on Eco-Innovation as a Determinant of the Energy Efficiency of the Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-29, September.
    7. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajra Malik & Hui Nee Au Yong & Zam Zuriyati Mohamad & Charles Ramendran S. P. R. & Chee Yin Yip & Chee Yang Fong & Mobashar Rehman & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Sustainable Smart Homes and Community Happiness in the Malaysian Context," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Anastasia Semenova & Konstantin Semenov & Maxim Storchevoy, 2024. "Green Patents or Growth? European and the USA Firms’ Size Dynamics and Environmental Innovations Financial Gains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Robert Huber & Bernhard Hirsch, 2017. "Behavioral Effects of Sustainability‐Oriented Incentive Systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 163-181, February.
    5. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1368-1375, December.
    6. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    7. Juan Alberto Aragon‐Correa & Dante I. Leyva‐de la Hiz, 2016. "The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource‐Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 421-434, September.
    8. Elisabeth Albertini, 2017. "What We Know About The Environmental Policy: An Inductive Typology Of The Research," Post-Print hal-02148591, HAL.
    9. Dezhong Duan & Qifan Xia, 2021. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote Environmental Innovation? An Empirical Study of Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Feliu López-i-Gelats & Jordi Bartolomé Filella, 2020. "Examining the role of organic production schemes in Mediterranean pastoralism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5771-5792, August.
    11. Tze San Ong & Ah Suat Lee & Boon Heng Teh & Hussain Bakhsh Magsi, 2019. "Environmental Innovation, Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Environmental Proactive Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Prayag Lal Yadav & Seung Hun Han & Hohyun Kim, 2017. "Manager’s Dilemma: Stockholders’ and Consumers’ Responses to Corporate Environmental Efforts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Prayag Lal Yadav & Seung Hun Han & Hohyun Kim, 2017. "Sustaining Competitive Advantage Through Corporate Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 345-357, March.
    14. Chi, Yi & Hu, Ning & Lu, Dong & Yang, Yang, 2023. "Green investment funds and corporate green innovation: From the logic of social value," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Larissa Marchiori Pacheco & Marlon Fernandes Rodrigues Alves & Lara Bartocci Liboni, 2018. "Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1502-1513, December.
    16. Hongquan Chen & Saixing Zeng & Han Lin & Hanyang Ma, 2017. "Munificence, Dynamism, and Complexity: How Industry Context Drives Corporate Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 125-141, February.
    17. Zhu, Qingyun & Sarkis, Joseph, 2016. "Green marketing and consumerism as social change in China: Analyzing the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 289-302.
    18. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla, 2021. "Are Environmentally Innovative Companies Inclined towards Integrated Environmental Disclosure Policies?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Kimitaka Nishitani & Munehiko Itoh, 2014. "Product Innovation in Response to Environmental Standards and Competitive Advantage: A Hedonic Analysis of Refrigerators in the Japanese Retail Market," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-30, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    20. Kenneth Dooley, 2018. "Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 70-81, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:17:y:2013:i:03:n:s136391961340015x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.