IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ceprxx/v03y2014i01ns179396901450006x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Industrial Policy to Upgrading Strategy: Dilemma of Local Developmental State in China's Pearl River Delta

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhao

    (ESSCA Ecole de Management, 1, rue Joseph Lakanal BP 40348 49003 Angers Cedex 01, France)

Abstract

Using the example of China's region of Pearl River Delta (PRD), this paper reveals the nature and characteristics of current industrial upgrading (IU) across the country's economy. After a brief review of the main approaches of IU, especially the global network/value chain approach, it differentiates the meaning and delineations of IU to firms and governments in the specific context of China. Taking the goals of IU as example, if, to most of the Chinese firms, it means manufacturing higher added-value products with better learnt technologies; to Chinese governments it is a clear long-run intention to produce more competitive Chinese firms in the global market. Based on quantitative data from a 1,200-firm survey and qualitative data from more than 40 firm case interviews in PRD during the year 2012–2013, the whole current situation of IU in PRD can be identified as a mixed economy, composed of one sector driven by State upgrading policy measures and another transformed through market mechanism and firm strategic choices. This dual economic structure under IU has significant implications to Chinese government. Because China's IU is now encountering a mismatch between the policy measures and firms' business behavior, the tough challenge for the Chinese government to achieve its strategic intention is not only how to create strategic high-tech sectors through strong State intervention, but also what new policy measures to design in order to eventually transform the large amount of local firms in manufacturing sectors whose advantage is traditionally based on cheap labor force and scale economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhao, 2014. "From Industrial Policy to Upgrading Strategy: Dilemma of Local Developmental State in China's Pearl River Delta," China Economic Policy Review (CEPR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 1-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ceprxx:v:03:y:2014:i:01:n:s179396901450006x
    DOI: 10.1142/S179396901450006X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S179396901450006X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S179396901450006X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Suzanne with the MIT Task Force on Production in the Innovation Economy, 2013. "Making in America: From Innovation to Market," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262019914, April.
    2. Herrigel, Gary, 2010. "Manufacturing Possibilities: Creative Action and Industrial Recomposition in the United States, Germany, and Japan," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199557738.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary Herrigel, 2015. "Globalization and the German industrial production model [Globalisierung und das deutsche Modell der Industrieproduktion]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 48(2), pages 133-149, August.
    2. Marc Doussard & Greg Schrock & Laura Wolf-Powers & Max Eisenburger & Stephen Marotta, 2018. "Manufacturing without the firm: Challenges for the maker movement in three U.S. cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 651-670, May.
    3. Marc Doussard & Greg Schrock & T William Lester, 2017. "Did US regions with manufacturing design generate more production jobs in the 2000s? New evidence on innovation and regional development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(13), pages 3119-3137, October.
    4. Cody, John, 2015. "How labor manages productivity advances and crisis response: A comparative study of automotive manufacturing in Germany and the US," GLU Working Papers 32, Global Labour University (GLU).
    5. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    6. Rawi Abdelal, 2013. "The profits of power: Commerce and realpolitik in Eurasia," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 421-456, June.
    7. Boschma, Ron & Capone, Gianluca, 2015. "Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1902-1914.
    8. Charles Sabel & Gary Herrigel & Peer Hull Kristensen, 2018. "Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 371-394, September.
    9. Peter Mayerhofer, 2013. "Wiens Industrie in der wissensbasierten Stadtwirtschaft. Wandlungsprozesse, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, industriepolitische Ansatzpunkte," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57934.
    10. Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock & Ranita Jain & Maureen Conway, 2021. "Genesis at work: Advancing inclusive innovation through manufacturing extension," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 224-241, May.
    11. Paola Mengoli & Margherita Russo, 2017. "A hybrid space to support the regeneration of competences for re-industrialization. Lessons from a research-action," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0150, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    12. Brown, Clair & Sturgeon, Timothy & Lane, Julia, 2014. "Using a business function framework to examine outsourcing and offshoring by US organizations," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt7cw581tg, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    13. Sofia Patsali, 2021. "University Procurement-led Innovation," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-13, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    14. Mark R. Ryan, 2018. "Teaching the Common Good in Business Ethics: A Case Study Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 693-704, February.
    15. Mariachiara Barzotto & Giancarlo Corò & Ilaria Mariotti & Marco Mutinelli, 2019. "Ownership and workforce composition: a counterfactual analysis of foreign multinationals and Italian uni-national firms," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(4), pages 581-607, December.
    16. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley & Peter Tyler, 2015. "Local growth evolutions: recession, resilience and recovery," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 141-148.
    17. Paola Mengoli & Margherita russo, 2014. "Innovation in education and re-industrialisation in Europe," Department of Economics (DEMB) 0035, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    18. Hassel, Anke, 2011. "The paradox of liberalization – understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53212, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissensintensive Unternehmensdienste, Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wachstum. Teilprojekt 1: Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung – Welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert das Wach," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58342.
    20. Alex Coad & Antonio Vezzani, 2017. "Manufacturing the future: is the manufacturing sector a driver of R&D, exports and productivity growth?," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2017-06, Joint Research Centre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ceprxx:v:03:y:2014:i:01:n:s179396901450006x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/cepr/cepr.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.