IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wri/journl/v40y2017i2p159-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation Errors Among Insurers: The Case of Subrogation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Ames
  • Bryan Graden
  • Jomo Sankara

Abstract

Subrogation is the right to pursue responsible third parties to recover amounts paid out to settle claims. Subrogation recoveries can be substantial and represent an estimate potentially subject to management bias. This study investigates factors associated with subrogation estimation errors. In a sample of generally understated subrogation estimates, we find that lower (weaker) financial strength ratings are positively related to more optimistic subrogation estimates. We also find that publicly owned firms, on average, report higher subrogation estimation errors. This effect is less pronounced among public insurers with weak ratings. Overall, our results suggest that subrogation estimates are more optimistic when firms struggle financially or are publicly owned.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Ames & Bryan Graden & Jomo Sankara, 2017. "Estimation Errors Among Insurers: The Case of Subrogation," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 40(2), pages 159-180.
  • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:40:y:2017:i:2:p:159-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.insuranceissues.org/PDFs/402AGS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ames Daniel & Graden Bryan S. & Sankara Jomo, 2019. "Who Estimates When It’s Not Required? the Case of Subrogation," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:40:y:2017:i:2:p:159-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James Barrese (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.