IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/wirecc/v8y2017i6ne484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How strong is public support for unilateral climate policy and what drives it?

Author

Listed:
  • Liam F. McGrath
  • Thomas Bernauer

Abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that climate change poses a global public goods problem, thus requiring a global solution that reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worldwide through some form of centralized target setting and burden‐sharing arrangement among countries. Yet, the 2015 Paris Agreement has essentially given up on this approach, on which the 1997 Kyoto Protocol was based, and now relies on policies that are adopted unilaterally and voluntarily by individual countries. Since ambitious climate policies are very unlikely to be enacted and effectively implemented without strong public support, research is beginning to explore how strong public support is for unilateral climate policy and what its determinants are. Recent research has developed useful survey instruments to gauge public support for unilateral climate policy. Results from surveys and survey‐embedded experiments show that when respondents are confronted with cost implications and free‐riding problems associated with unilateral climate policy, public support tends to drop to some extent, but still remains quite high. Current research thus shows that people are—the hitherto strong global public goods framing of climate policy notwithstanding—surprisingly nonreciprocal in their climate policy preferences. Preferences concerning climate policy tend to be driven primarily by a range of personal predispositions and cost considerations, which existing research has already explored quite extensively, rather than by considerations of what other countries do. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e484. doi: 10.1002/wcc.484 This article is categorized under: Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Behavior Change and Responses Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance

Suggested Citation

  • Liam F. McGrath & Thomas Bernauer, 2017. "How strong is public support for unilateral climate policy and what drives it?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:8:y:2017:i:6:n:e484
    DOI: 10.1002/wcc.484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.484
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/wcc.484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heiner von Lüpke, 2023. "The Just Energy Transition Partnership in South Africa: Identification and Assessment of Key Factors Driving International Cooperation," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2062, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Antonina Ivanova Boncheva, 2022. "Finance for Climate Action: Postcovid-19 Recovery Challenges," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, Abril - J.
    3. Jeremiás Máté Balogh & Tamás Mizik, 2023. "Global Impacts of Climate Policy and Trade Agreements on Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Patrick Bayer & Federica Genovese, 2020. "Beliefs About Consequences from Climate Action Under Weak Climate Institutions: Sectors, Home Bias, and International Embeddedness," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 28-50, Autumn.
    5. Håkon Sælen, 2020. "Under What Conditions Will the Paris Process Produce a Cycle of Increasing Ambition Sufficient to Reach the 2°C Goal?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(2), pages 83-104, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:8:y:2017:i:6:n:e484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1757-7799 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.