IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v54y2015i4p438-472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are We in This Together? The Dynamics and Performance Implications of Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Logistics Outsourcing Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Rossiter Hofer

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanisms through which two dimensions of interorganizational interdependence—dependence asymmetry and joint dependence—impact a customer's key attitudinal and behavioral dimensions in the relationship with a third‐party logistics provider (3PL), as well as associated performance outcomes. Results of a survey with customers of a large 3PL in Brazil indicate that customers embedded in relationships with high levels of joint dependence exhibit higher levels of long‐term orientation toward and operational information exchange with the 3PL, which positively impact their logistics outsourcing performance. In addition, it is found that the direction of the customer's dependence asymmetry—advantage or disadvantage—in the relationship with the 3PL enhances or hinders the effects of joint dependence. Specifically, while a customer's dependence disadvantage positively impacts its long‐term orientation, a customer's dependence advantage negatively impacts its long‐term orientation, which can be detrimental to its logistics outsourcing performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Rossiter Hofer, 2015. "Are We in This Together? The Dynamics and Performance Implications of Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Logistics Outsourcing Relationships," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 438-472, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:54:y:2015:i:4:p:438-472
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.54.4.0438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.54.4.0438
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.54.4.0438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:54:y:2015:i:4:p:438-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.