IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v7y2004i2p186-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systems engineering aspects in theatre missile defense—design principles and a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Z. Ben‐Asher

Abstract

Theatre missile defense systems are classified as systems‐of‐systems. System‐level design principles should therefore apply to this type of systems. These principles involve mainly balancing between independency and autonomy of the subsystems on the one hand, with strong incentives for collaboration on the other hand. A case study of a theatre missile defense boost‐phase interception system is studied in light of these principles. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 7: 186–194, 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Z. Ben‐Asher, 2004. "Systems engineering aspects in theatre missile defense—design principles and a case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 186-194.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:186-194
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.10058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10058
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.10058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark W. Maier, 1998. "Architecting principles for systems‐of‐systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 267-284.
    2. Ofri Becker & Joseph Ben‐ Asher & Ilya Ackerman, 2000. "A method for system interface reduction using N2 charts," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 27-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blake Roberts & Thomas Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2016. "Engineered Resilience for Complex Systems as a Predictor for Cost Overruns," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 111-132, March.
    2. Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Olga Dudareva, 2023. "Integration as a Driver of Enterprise Sustainability: The Russian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Richard Volkert & Jerrell Stracener & Junfang Yu, 2014. "Incorporating a Measure of Uncertainty into Systems of Systems Development Performance Measures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 297-312, September.
    4. Takehiro Inohara & Keith W. Hipel, 2008. "Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 343-359, December.
    5. Flavio Oquendo, 2019. "Architecting exogenous software‐intensive systems‐of‐systems on the internet‐of‐vehicles with SosADL," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 502-518, November.
    6. Mohsen Mosleh & Peter Ludlow & Babak Heydari, 2016. "Distributed Resource Management in Systems of Systems: An Architecture Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 362-374, July.
    7. Yacov Y. Haimes & Barry M. Horowitz & Zhenyu Guo & Eva Andrijcic & Joshua Bogdanor, 2015. "Assessing Systemic Risk to Cloud‐Computing Technology as Complex Interconnected Systems of Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 284-299, May.
    8. Tamir Bustnay & Joseph Z. Ben‐Asher, 2005. "How many systems are there?—using the N2 method for systems partitioning," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 109-118.
    9. Jo Ann Lane & Barry Boehm, 2008. "System of systems lead system integrators: Where Do they spend their time and what makes them more or less efficient?," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 81-91, March.
    10. M. D. Guenov & S. G. Barker, 2005. "Application of axiomatic design and design structure matrix to the decomposition of engineering systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 29-40.
    11. Alessandro Aliakbargolkar & Edward F. Crawley, 2013. "Architecting methodology for spatially and temporally distributed resource extraction systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 277-286, September.
    12. Jo Ann Lane & Tim Bohn, 2013. "Using SysML modeling to understand and evolve systems of systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 87-98, March.
    13. Bernard Collins & Steven Doskey & James Moreland, 2017. "Modeling the Convergence of Collaborative Systems of Systems: A Quantitative Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 357-378, July.
    14. Ali A. Yassine & Luke A. Wissmann, 2007. "The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 118-137, June.
    15. Miri Sitton & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Enterprise Systems Engineering for Better Operational Interoperability," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 625-638, November.
    16. Sarah A Sheard & Ali Mostashari, 2009. "Principles of complex systems for systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 295-311, December.
    17. Dov Dvir & Aaron J. Shenhar & Shlomo Alkaher, 2003. "From a single discipline product to a multidisciplinary system: Adapting the right style to the right project," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 123-134.
    18. Paul T. Grogan & Sebastiaan A. Meijer, 2017. "Gaming Methods in Engineering Systems Research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 542-552, November.
    19. Michael J. Pennock & William B. Rouse, 2016. "The Epistemology of Enterprises," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 24-43, January.
    20. Liwång, Hans, 2022. "Defense development: The role of co-creation in filling the gap between policy-makers and technology development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:186-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.