IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v19y2016i2p111-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineered Resilience for Complex Systems as a Predictor for Cost Overruns

Author

Listed:
  • Blake Roberts
  • Thomas Mazzuchi
  • Shahram Sarkani

Abstract

The ever‐increasing complexity of large‐scale, ubiquitous systems, and internetworked Systems of Systems (SoS), have resulted in non‐linear challenges for systems engineering and program management such as interdependent, dynamic, and emergent behaviors that influence design and development cost. In order to invest, make decisions, and effectively manage technology developments, “should‐cost” estimates are used to baseline systems to what is considered affordable over the lifecycle. In addition to a higher likelihood for overrun, complex systems traditionally require major acquisitions, budgets, and development schedules where failure results in increased cost consequences. Behavioral properties (such as emergence) can influence performance resulting in dynamic and unpredictable effects on networked platform operation, system capability, and mission effectiveness. Data analyzed from 526 major weapons programs and from subject‐matter expert judgment are explored to propose: (1) a new approach to quantify these risks using prescriptive measures related to complexity, adaptability, and resilience, (2) identify leading indicators to reduce the likelihood of cost overrun, (3) suggest measurements based on research findings and systems heuristics to improve lifecycle cost estimation, and (4) present applications of Engineering Resilience to meet the growing complexity, interdependence, and scale of systems under constrained budgets with a growing demand for affordability.

Suggested Citation

  • Blake Roberts & Thomas Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2016. "Engineered Resilience for Complex Systems as a Predictor for Cost Overruns," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 111-132, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:111-132
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21339
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark W. Maier, 1998. "Architecting principles for systems‐of‐systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 267-284.
    2. Sarah A Sheard & Ali Mostashari, 2009. "Principles of complex systems for systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 295-311, December.
    3. Robert Neches & Azad M. Madni, 2013. "Towards affordably adaptable and effective systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 224-234, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azad M. Madni & Michael Sievers, 2014. "System of Systems Integration: Key Considerations and Challenges," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 330-347, September.
    2. Christos Ellinas & Neil Allan & Anders Johansson, 2016. "Exploring Structural Patterns Across Evolved and Designed Systems: A Network Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 179-192, May.
    3. Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Olga Dudareva, 2023. "Integration as a Driver of Enterprise Sustainability: The Russian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Chen, Nan & Qi, Di, 2024. "A physics-informed data-driven algorithm for ensemble forecast of complex turbulent systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    5. Richard Volkert & Jerrell Stracener & Junfang Yu, 2014. "Incorporating a Measure of Uncertainty into Systems of Systems Development Performance Measures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 297-312, September.
    6. Takehiro Inohara & Keith W. Hipel, 2008. "Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 343-359, December.
    7. Dawn Gilbert & Mike Yearworth, 2016. "Complexity in a Systems Engineering Organization: An Empirical Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 422-435, September.
    8. Flavio Oquendo, 2019. "Architecting exogenous software‐intensive systems‐of‐systems on the internet‐of‐vehicles with SosADL," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 502-518, November.
    9. Mohsen Mosleh & Peter Ludlow & Babak Heydari, 2016. "Distributed Resource Management in Systems of Systems: An Architecture Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 362-374, July.
    10. Yacov Y. Haimes & Barry M. Horowitz & Zhenyu Guo & Eva Andrijcic & Joshua Bogdanor, 2015. "Assessing Systemic Risk to Cloud‐Computing Technology as Complex Interconnected Systems of Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 284-299, May.
    11. Jo Ann Lane & Barry Boehm, 2008. "System of systems lead system integrators: Where Do they spend their time and what makes them more or less efficient?," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 81-91, March.
    12. Alessandro Aliakbargolkar & Edward F. Crawley, 2013. "Architecting methodology for spatially and temporally distributed resource extraction systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 277-286, September.
    13. Jo Ann Lane & Tim Bohn, 2013. "Using SysML modeling to understand and evolve systems of systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 87-98, March.
    14. Bernard Collins & Steven Doskey & James Moreland, 2017. "Modeling the Convergence of Collaborative Systems of Systems: A Quantitative Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 357-378, July.
    15. Michael W. Grenn & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi, 2014. "The Requirements Entropy Framework in Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 462-478, December.
    16. Tran, Huy T. & Balchanos, Michael & Domerçant, Jean Charles & Mavris, Dimitri N., 2017. "A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 73-84.
    17. Ali A. Yassine & Luke A. Wissmann, 2007. "The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 118-137, June.
    18. Miri Sitton & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Enterprise Systems Engineering for Better Operational Interoperability," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 625-638, November.
    19. Michel‐Alexandre Cardin & Mehdi Ranjbar‐Bourani & Richard de Neufville, 2015. "Improving the Lifecycle Performance of Engineering Projects with Flexible Strategies: Example of On‐Shore LNG Production Design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 253-268, May.
    20. Sarah A Sheard & Ali Mostashari, 2009. "Principles of complex systems for systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 295-311, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:111-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.