IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v18y2015i6p584-603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Cilli
  • Gregory S. Parnell
  • Robert Cloutier
  • Teresa Zigh

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has recently revised the defense acquisition system to address suspected root causes hindering higher success rates. This article applies two systems thinking methodologies in a uniquely integrated fashion to provide an in‐depth review and compelling interpretation of the revised defense acquisition system as put forth in January 7, 2015 DoDI 5000.02. Changes from the previous defense acquisition system are significant and may be cause for some cautious optimism in the United States. This article describes how the architects of the revised defense acquisition system have increased emphasis on systems engineering activities applied early in the lifecycle so that meaningful trade‐offs between capability requirements and lifecycle costs can be explored as requirements are being written to ensure realistic program baselines are established such that associated lifecycle costs will likely fit within future budgets. Expressed as emerging systems engineering research questions, this article identifies several gaps that are likely to emerge as the defense acquisition community attempts to execute the new acquisition system.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Cilli & Gregory S. Parnell & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "A Systems Engineering Perspective on the Revised Defense Acquisition System," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 584-603, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:18:y:2015:i:6:p:584-603
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Nowicki & Brian Sauser & Wesley Randall & Robert Lusch, 2018. "Service-Dominant Logic and Performance-Based Contracting: A Systems Thinking Perspective," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 12-24, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:18:y:2015:i:6:p:584-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.