IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v16y2013i4p413-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Project–Product Lifecycle Management with Model–Based Design Structure Matrix: A joint project management and systems engineering approach

Author

Listed:
  • Amira Sharon
  • Olivier L. de Weck
  • Dov Dori

Abstract

We investigate potential benefits of employing the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) in the context of Model–Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) for the purposes of analyzing and improving the design of a product–project ensemble. Focusing on process DSM, we present an algorithm for a bidirectional transformation framework between a product–project system model and its corresponding Model–Based DSM (MDSM). Using Object–Process Methodology (OPM) as the underlying modeling language, we examine and characterize useful and insightful relationships between the system model and its MDSM. An unmanned aerial vehicle case study demonstrates the semantics of and analogy between various types of relationships as they are reflected in both the OPM system model and the MDSM derived from it. We conclude with further research direction on showing how clustering of DSM processes can be reflected back as an improvement of the OPM model. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 16

Suggested Citation

  • Amira Sharon & Olivier L. de Weck & Dov Dori, 2013. "Improving Project–Product Lifecycle Management with Model–Based Design Structure Matrix: A joint project management and systems engineering approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 413-426, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:16:y:2013:i:4:p:413-426
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21240
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amira Sharon & Olivier L. de Weck & Dov Dori, 2011. "Project management vs. systems engineering management: A practitioners' view on integrating the project and product domains," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 427-440, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amira Sharon & Dov Dori, 2017. "Model‐Based Project‐Product Lifecycle Management and Gantt Chart Models: A Comparative Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 447-466, September.
    2. Izack Cohen & Michal Iluz & Avraham Shtub, 2014. "A Simulation‐Based Approach in Support of Project Management Training for Systems Engineers," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 26-36, March.
    3. Christos Ellinas & Neil Allan & Anders Johansson, 2016. "Exploring Structural Patterns Across Evolved and Designed Systems: A Network Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 179-192, May.
    4. John Wood & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi & Timothy Eveleigh, 2013. "A framework for capturing the hidden stakeholder system," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 251-266, September.
    5. Fabian Heitmann & Johannes Halbe & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "Integrated and Participatory Design of Sustainable Development Strategies on Multiple Governance Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-27, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:16:y:2013:i:4:p:413-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.