IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v31y2023i4p2212-2221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational externalities and corporate green innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbing Jiang
  • Xuejun Wang
  • Lei Du

Abstract

Based on the intergenerational externalities views, this paper builds the link between ecological damage claim policy and firms' green innovation. Making polluters bear intergenerational responsibility is considered to be a key move to break intergenerational externalities and effectively address the problem of multiple environmental failures. The ecological damage claim policy makes the environmental rights of future generations being remedied through judicial procedures, and can clarify pollution responsibility to push firms to choose long‐term environmental solutions for achieving intergenerational sustainability and maintaining intergenerational justice. Using longitudinal data (2012–2017) covering 4992 Chinese firm‐year observations in high‐pollution industries, we find that ecological damage claim policy promotes firms' green innovation. This positive effect is stronger when the firm is located in a region with stronger environmental enforcement and more environmental organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbing Jiang & Xuejun Wang & Lei Du, 2023. "Intergenerational externalities and corporate green innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2212-2221, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:4:p:2212-2221
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2501
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pongsapak Chindasombatcharoen & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2022. "Achieving sustainable development goals through board size and innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 664-677, August.
    2. Borghesi, Simone & Cainelli, Giulio & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2015. "Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 669-683.
    3. repec:cup:jfinqa:v:46:y:2011:i:06:p:1865-1891_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Tu, Zhengge & Hu, Tianyang & Shen, Renjun, 2019. "Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 111-123.
    5. Bithas, Kostas, 2011. "Sustainability and externalities: Is the internalization of externalities a sufficient condition for sustainability?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1703-1706, August.
    6. Yu, Frank & Yu, Xiaoyun, 2011. "Corporate Lobbying and Fraud Detection," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(6), pages 1865-1891, December.
    7. Zelong Wei & Hao Shen & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li, 2017. "How Does Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in a Dysfunctional Institutional Environment? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 209-223, January.
    8. Heijdra, Ben J. & Kooiman, Jan Peter & Ligthart, Jenny E., 2006. "Environmental quality, the macroeconomy, and intergenerational distribution," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 74-104, January.
    9. Gregory Jackson & Julia Bartosch & Emma Avetisyan & Daniel Kinderman & Jette Steen Knudsen, 2020. "Mandatory Non-financial Disclosure and Its Influence on CSR: An International Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 323-342, March.
    10. Ahmet Koseoglu & Ali Gokhan Yucel & Recep Ulucak, 2022. "Green innovation and ecological footprint relationship for a sustainable development: Evidence from top 20 green innovator countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 976-988, October.
    11. Meiling Wang & Silu Pang & Ikram Hmani & Ilham Hmani & Cunfang Li & Zhengxia He, 2021. "Towards sustainable development: How does technological innovation drive the increase in green total factor productivity?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 217-227, January.
    12. Hu, Yucai & Ren, Shenggang & Wang, Yangjie & Chen, Xiaohong, 2020. "Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Ren, Shenggang & He, Duojun & Yan, Ji & Zeng, Huixiang & Tan, Justin, 2022. "Environmental labeling certification and corporate environmental innovation: The moderating role of corporate ownership and local government intervention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 556-571.
    14. Gladys Lee & Xinning Xiao, 2020. "Voluntary Engagement in Environmental Projects: Evidence from Environmental Violators," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 325-348, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mi Sook Lee, 2024. "The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2797-2810, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Du & Xing Liu & Helin Sun, 2024. "Corporate sustainable development strategies: Under the collaborative governance of government and the public," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3055-3064, August.
    2. Jing Zou, 2024. "The Relationship Between Corporate Financialization and Digital Finance in the Era of Digital Transformation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13425-13448, September.
    3. Gu, Guangtong & Zheng, Haorong & Tong, Lingyun & Dai, Yaxian, 2022. "Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Yu, Xiaolin & Wan, Kai & Du, Qunyang, 2023. "Can carbon market policies achieve a “point-to-surface” effect?—Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Hong, Qianqian & Cui, Linhao & Hong, Penghui, 2022. "The impact of carbon emissions trading on energy efficiency: Evidence from quasi-experiment in China's carbon emissions trading pilot," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Wu, Rongxin & Tan, Zhizhou & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China's iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Chen, Xiaoqi & Li, Weiping & Chen, Zifang & Huang, Jiashun, 2022. "Environmental regulation and real earnings management—Evidence from the SO2 emissions trading system in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    8. Li Chen & Di Wang & Ruyi Shi, 2022. "Can China’s Carbon Emissions Trading System Achieve the Synergistic Effect of Carbon Reduction and Pollution Control?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Ding, Qian & Huang, Jianbai & Chen, Jinyu, 2023. "Does digital finance matter for corporate green investment? Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Hu, Yucai & Li, Ranran & Du, Lei & Ren, Shenggang & Chevallier, Julien, 2022. "Could SO2 and CO2 emissions trading schemes achieve co-benefits of emissions reduction?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Jin, Chenfei & Tsai, Fu-Sheng & Gu, Qiuyang & Wu, Bao, 2022. "Does the porter hypothesis work well in the emission trading schema pilot? Exploring moderating effects of institutional settings," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. Zhang, Hua & Xu, Tiantian & Feng, Chao, 2022. "Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Ren, Shenggang & Yang, Xuanyu & Hu, Yucai & Chevallier, Julien, 2022. "Emission trading, induced innovation and firm performance," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Zhao, Tianzhen & Ke, Haiqian & Zhang, Ning, 2025. "Comparing the innovation impacts on firms: Pilot vs. National Carbon Emission Trading Schemes in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PB).
    15. Wenbing Jiang & Xuejun Wang & Lei Du, 2024. "Environmental Health Check: How third‐party environmental evaluation project affects corporate environmental responsibility," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3065-3074, August.
    16. Yucai Hu & Shaorui Du & Yukun Wang & Xinya Yang, 2023. "How Does Green Insurance Affect Green Innovation? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Luoqiong Zhou & Lei Du, 2024. "Improving the sustainable development of firms: Evidence from the environmental constraint target policy in China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1217-1225, February.
    18. Li Liu & Lei Du & Xing Liu, 2023. "Lessons from failure: Pollution blacklisting and firm's green innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 483-491, February.
    19. Aihua Wu & Xiaoqing Zhai, 2023. "Sources of knowledge and innovation for sustainable development: A multifaceted perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2874-2891, August.
    20. Shashi, & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Singh, Rajwinder, 2019. "The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 111-124.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:4:p:2212-2221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.