IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i4p3065-3074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Health Check: How third‐party environmental evaluation project affects corporate environmental responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbing Jiang
  • Xuejun Wang
  • Lei Du

Abstract

Third‐party environmental evaluation by environmental organizations can provide an independent professional evaluation of firms' environmental behaviors. Because environmental organizations aim to improve environmental welfare, which reflects value rationality than instrumental rationality. We argue that third‐party environmental evaluation can reduce information asymmetries between central and local governments, and induce local governments to strengthen environmental enforcement, which in turn increases the pressure on polluters. At the same time, third‐party evaluation improves transparency and exposes firms' environmental opportunistic behavior, which increases the pressure on firms to take more responsibility for environmental protection. In an analysis of a large sample of Chinese listed firms over the period 2009–2018, we find that third‐party evaluation from environmental organizations has a positive impact on firms' environmental responsibility. This positive effect is stronger for firms located in regions with weak local protectionism and weaker for firms with less external shareholder monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbing Jiang & Xuejun Wang & Lei Du, 2024. "Environmental Health Check: How third‐party environmental evaluation project affects corporate environmental responsibility," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3065-3074, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:3065-3074
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2834
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:3065-3074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.