IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v30y2022i1p203-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How FIFA World Cup 2022™ can meet the carbon neutral commitments and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development?: Reflections from the tree nursery project in Qatar

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Spanos
  • Murat Kucukvar
  • Timothy C. Bell
  • Aza Elnimah
  • Hanin Hamdan
  • Bodour Al Meer
  • Shashi Prakash
  • Orjan Lundberg
  • Adeeb A. Kutty
  • Aya H. A. AlKhereibi

Abstract

With sustainability at the heart of Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup 2022™, Qatar has set a track to achieve carbon neutrality, committing to deliver the first‐ever carbon neutral mega event in the world. Achieving these goals require offsetting carbon emissions through quality projects within and outside the state. Tree nurseries with stress‐tolerant variants play a significant role in cutting the excess emissions from Qatar 2022, thereby supporting long‐term sustainable development. This research presents a novel approach to offset carbon emissions utilizing the carbon sequestration potential of trees planted in a tree nursery project in Qatar. The i‐Tree assessment tool and a well‐established US database are used in this regard to undertake a correlation climatic condition analysis between Doha and five locations in the United States with similar demographics as the State of Qatar. The tree nursery data along with water consumption, fertilizer use, and power consumption, were fed as the inputs to the assessment tool. The assessments were carried out considering different irrigation methods for trees and shrubs, treated sewage water with a significant amount of organic fertilizer, and desalinated water. The analysis showed a net‐carbon‐emission reduction equal to 23.482 t CO2‐eqv/year using the treated sewage water. The tree nursery project has a carbon reduction potential of 21.902% compared to the maximum carbon sequestration potential of 30.39 kg/CO2‐eqv/tree/year, when using treated sewage water and a mix of the specific fertilizer. However, the use of desalinated water holds a negative impact on the carbon balance to such a level that the introduction of trees in Middle Eastern may not positively affect climate change mitigation. It was also found that the amount of carbon footprint reduction after the FIFA World Cup 2022 is expected to increase steadily during the average life expectancy of the trees assessed, which were evaluated to be circa 135 years. The results presented support urban planners in proposing integrated sustainability planning strategies and policies. These strategies can initiate projects such as nurseries, parks, and open space areas to reduce carbon footprints, improve the city's social and economic aspects, and preserve the post‐event legacy of mega‐sporting events like the World Cup and Olympic Sports.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Spanos & Murat Kucukvar & Timothy C. Bell & Aza Elnimah & Hanin Hamdan & Bodour Al Meer & Shashi Prakash & Orjan Lundberg & Adeeb A. Kutty & Aya H. A. AlKhereibi, 2022. "How FIFA World Cup 2022™ can meet the carbon neutral commitments and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development?: Reflections from the tree nursery project in Qatar," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 203-226, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:203-226
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2239
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvaro Duque & Miguel A. Peña & Francisco Cuesta & Sebastián González-Caro & Peter Kennedy & Oliver L. Phillips & Marco Calderón-Loor & Cecilia Blundo & Julieta Carilla & Leslie Cayola & William Farfá, 2021. "Author Correction: Mature Andean forests as globally important carbon sinks and future carbon refuges," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1, December.
    2. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat, 2020. "Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Alvaro Duque & Miguel A. Peña & Francisco Cuesta & Sebastián González-Caro & Peter Kennedy & Oliver L. Phillips & Marco Calderón-Loor & Cecilia Blundo & Julieta Carilla & Leslie Cayola & William Farfá, 2021. "Mature Andean forests as globally important carbon sinks and future carbon refuges," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin D. Gay & Bryce Currey & E. N. J. Brookshire, 2022. "Global distribution and climate sensitivity of the tropical montane forest nitrogen cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Aida Cuni-Sanchez & Emanuel H. Martin & Eustrate Uzabaho & Alain S. K. Ngute & Robert Bitariho & Charles Kayijamahe & Andrew R. Marshall & Nassoro A. Mohamed & Gideon A. Mseja & Aventino Nkwasibwe & F, 2024. "Evidence of thermophilization in Afromontane forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Yuan Yuan & Xintong Sun & Ning Liu, 2022. "Measuring structural characteristics and evolutionary patterns of an industrial carbon footprint network: A social network analysis approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 159-180, November.
    4. Jingwei Han & Zhixiong Tan & Maozhi Chen & Liang Zhao & Ling Yang & Siying Chen, 2022. "Carbon Footprint Research Based on Input–Output Model—A Global Scientometric Visualization Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Yuki Kinoshita & Takaki Nagao & Hiromasa Ijuin & Keisuke Nagasawa & Tetsuo Yamada & Surendra M. Gupta, 2023. "Utilization of Free Trade Agreements to Minimize Costs and Carbon Emissions in the Global Supply Chain for Sustainable Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Qiang Du & Jiajie Zhou, 2022. "Evolution of Low Carbon Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Sun, Chen & Song, Junnian & Zhang, Dongqi & Wang, Xiaofan & Yang, Wei & Qi, Zhimin & Chen, Shaoqing, 2023. "Tracing urban carbon footprints differentiating supply chain complexity: A metropolis case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Fang, Zigeng & Yan, Jiayi & Lu, Qiuchen & Chen, Long & Yang, Pu & Tang, Junqing & Jiang, Feng & Broyd, Tim & Hong, Jingke, 2023. "A systematic literature review of carbon footprint decision-making approaches for infrastructure and building projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    9. Jiaojiao Yang & Ting Wang & Yujie Hu & Qiyun Deng & Shu Mo, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Research Trends and Hotspots of Foreign and Chinese Building Carbon Emissions Based on Bibliometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Nuri Cihat Onat & Galal M. Abdella & Murat Kucukvar & Adeeb A. Kutty & Munera Al‐Nuaimi & Gürkan Kumbaroğlu & Melih Bulu, 2021. "How eco‐efficient are electric vehicles across Europe? A regionalized life cycle assessment‐based eco‐efficiency analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 941-956, September.
    11. Jindao Chen & Yuhong Wang & Qian Shi & Xu Peng & Juhuan Zheng, 2021. "An international comparison analysis of CO2 emissions in the construction industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 754-767, July.
    12. Saleh Aseel & Hussein Al-Yafei & Murat Kucukvar & Nuri C. Onat, 2021. "Life Cycle Air Emissions and Social Human Health Impact Assessment of Liquified Natural Gas Maritime Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Murat Kucukvar & Khalel Ahmed Alawi & Galal M. Abdella & Muhammet Enis Bulak & Nuri C. Onat & Melih Bulu & Murat Yalçıntaş, 2021. "A frontier‐based managerial approach for relative sustainability performance assessment of the world's airports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 89-107, January.
    14. Mingjun Ma & Ziqiao Li & Kai Xue & Meng Liu, 2021. "Exergy-Based Life Cycle Assessment Model for Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Bridge: Principle and Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Moussavi, S. & Barutha, P. & Dvorak, B., 2023. "Environmental life cycle assessment of a novel offshore wind energy design project: A United States based case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Helo, Petri & Mayanti, Bening & Bejarano, Ronal & Sundman, Christian, 2024. "Sustainable supply chains – Managing environmental impact data on product platforms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Augustine Blay-Armah & Ali Bahadori-Jahromi & Anastasia Mylona & Mark Barthorpe & Marco Ferri, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Impact of Databases on End-of-Life Embodied Carbon Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Mhatre, Purva & Gedam, Vidyadhar V. & Unnikrishnan, Seema, 2021. "Material circularity potential for construction materials – The case of transportation infrastructure in India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:203-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.