IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v14y2006i3p190-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits of green offices in the UK: analysis from examples built in the 1990s

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Edwards

    (ECA and Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK)

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution in the UK of green offices against a background of changing government and industry perspectives. A key factor discussed is the emergence of evidence that such buildings can lead to improvements in productivity in the workforce and hence greater competitiveness for the company involved. The paper reviews the measures and criteria employed for evaluating the performance of green buildings at the critical interface between environmental and economic factors. There is a general overview of the design and corporate ambition behind a number of green offices built in the 1990s and a more detailed examination of one. The paper reaches a number of conclusions of interest outside the UK, notably that users of buildings should be more involved in project briefing in order for the energy, health and productivity benefits to be effectively integrated. The paper also highlights the different perspectives held by clients, designers and users of green offices and how these alter the motivations at the genesis of a project. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Edwards, 2006. "Benefits of green offices in the UK: analysis from examples built in the 1990s," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 190-204.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:14:y:2006:i:3:p:190-204
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sd.263
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingrid Nappi-Choulet & Aurélien Decamps, 2012. "The impact of energy efficiency and green performance on the value of corporate real estate portfolios," ERES eres2012_145, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Hung Duy Nguyen & Laura Macchion, 2023. "Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2136-2172, March.
    3. Ingrid Nappi-Choulet & Aurelien Decamps, 2013. "Can Sustainability Enhance Business District Attractiveness? A Survey of Corporate Property Decisions in France," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(16), pages 3283-3304, December.
    4. Ghasan Alfalah & Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Tarek Zayed, 2022. "An Integrated Fuzzy-Based Sustainability Framework for Post-Secondary Educational Buildings: A User-Perspective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Keyvanfar, Ali & Shafaghat, Arezou & Abd Majid, Muhd Zaimi & Bin Lamit, Hasanuddin & Warid Hussin, Mohd & Binti Ali, Kherun Nita & Dhafer Saad, Alshahri, 2014. "User satisfaction adaptive behaviors for assessing energy efficient building indoor cooling and lighting environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 277-295.
    6. Nappi-Choulet, Ingrid & Décamps, Aurélien, 2011. "Is Sustainability Attractive for Corporate Real Estate Decisions ?," ESSEC Working Papers WP1106, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    7. Chen-Yi Sun & Yin-Guang Chen & Rong-Jing Wang & Shih-Chi Lo & Jyh-Tyng Yau & Ya-Wen Wu, 2019. "Construction Cost of Green Building Certified Residence: A Case Study in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:14:y:2006:i:3:p:190-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.