IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v7y1987i2p225-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiobjective Risk‐Impact Analysis Method

Author

Listed:
  • Mark R. Leach
  • Yacov Y. Haimes

Abstract

This paper integrates two methodologies of risk and impact analysis—the partitioned multiobjective risk method (PMRM) and the multiobjective, multistage impact analysis method (MMIAM). The PMRM, in an effort to overcome the difficulties created by commensurating extreme events that have catastrophic impacts with those that have more frequent but less harmful consequences, introduces the use of conditional expectations for different regimes of probabilities and damages. The MMIAM is a multiobjective decisionmaking method for impact analysis which explicitly develops trade‐offs among different objectives at different stages or periods. Decision makers who must act under conditions of extreme risk and uncertainty often find that they are more interested in knowing “what not to do” than they are in optimizing their current objectives (the more traditional aim of decision‐making methodologies). This paper focuses on a way to answer their needs, in which major elements of both the PMRM and the MMIAM are combined in a new, integrated methodology, termed here the multiobjective risk‐impact analysis method (MRIAM). The new methodology incorporates risk and impact analysis within a dynamic multiobjective decision‐making framework. To demonstrate the usefulness of the integrated methodology, an example problem concerning the environmental effects of pollutant emissions over a number of years is formulated, solved, and analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark R. Leach & Yacov Y. Haimes, 1987. "Multiobjective Risk‐Impact Analysis Method," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 225-241, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:7:y:1987:i:2:p:225-241
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00984.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00984.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00984.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel E. Bodily, 1980. "Analysis of Risks to Life and Limb," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 156-175, February.
    2. William B. Fairley, 1981. "Assessment for Catastrophic Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 197-204, September.
    3. John D. Graham & James W. Vaupel, 1981. "Value of a Life: What Difference Does It Make?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 89-95, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Mitsiopoulos & Yacov Y. Haimes, 1989. "Generalized Quantification of Risk Associated with Extreme Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 243-254, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory B. Rodgers & Paul H. Rubin, 1989. "Cost‐Benefit Analysis of All‐Terrain Vehicles at the CPSC," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 63-69, March.
    2. Lester B. Lave & Joshua Menkes, 1985. "Managing Risk: A Joint U.S.‐German Perspective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 17-23, March.
    3. Tammy O. Tengs & Miriam E. Adams & Joseph S. Pliskin & Dana Gelb Safran & Joanna E. Siegel & Milton C. Weinstein & John D. Graham, 1995. "Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐Effectiveness," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 369-390, June.
    4. Janet Currie & Jonathan Gruber, 1994. "Saving Babies: The Efficacy and Cost of Recent Expansions of Medicaid Eligibility for Pregnant Women," NBER Working Papers 4644, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Ralph L. Keeney, 1995. "Understanding Life‐Threatening Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 627-637, December.
    6. Agricultural Economics Department, 1989. "Public Choices and Private Risks: The Role of Economic Analysis," 1989 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk Meeting, April 9-12, 1989, Sanibel Island, Florida 271521, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    7. Jatin Nathwani & Jan Narveson, 1995. "Three Principles for Managing Risk in the Public Interest," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 615-626, December.
    8. Ralph L. Keeney, 1984. "Ethics, Decision Analysis, and Public Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 117-129, June.
    9. Timothy O'Riordan & Ray Kemp & H. Michael Purdue, 1987. "On Weighing Gains and Investments at the Margin of Risk Regulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 361-369, September.
    10. Ried, Walter, 1998. "QALYs versus HYEs--what's right and what's wrong. A review of the controversy," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 607-625, October.
    11. Ried, Walter, 1996. "QALYs versus HYEs - What's Right and What's Wrong," Discussion Papers 544, Institut fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Abteilung fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre.
    12. L. Robin Keller & Rakesh K. Sarin, 1988. "Equity in Social Risk: Some Empirical Observations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 135-146, March.
    13. John M. Mendeloff & Robert M. Kaplan, 1989. "Are Large Differences in “Lifesaving” Costs Justified? A Psychometric Study of the Relative Value Placed on Preventing Deaths," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 349-363, September.
    14. Alison C. Taylor & John S. Evans & Thomas E. McKone, 1993. "The Value of Animal Test Information in Environmental Control Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 403-412, August.
    15. Hileman, Jacob D. & Angst, Mario & Scott, Tyler A. & Sundström, Emma, 2021. "Recycled text and risk communication in natural gas pipeline environmental impact assessments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:7:y:1987:i:2:p:225-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.