IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v36y2016i9p1718-1736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey of Ambient Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Susan C. Anenberg
  • Anna Belova
  • Jørgen Brandt
  • Neal Fann
  • Sue Greco
  • Sarath Guttikunda
  • Marie‐Eve Heroux
  • Fintan Hurley
  • Michal Krzyzanowski
  • Sylvia Medina
  • Brian Miller
  • Kiran Pandey
  • Joachim Roos
  • Rita Van Dingenen

Abstract

Designing air quality policies that improve public health can benefit from information about air pollution health risks and impacts, which include respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and premature death. Several computer‐based tools help automate air pollution health impact assessments and are being used for a variety of contexts. Expanding information gathered for a May 2014 World Health Organization expert meeting, we survey 12 multinational air pollution health impact assessment tools, categorize them according to key technical and operational characteristics, and identify limitations and challenges. Key characteristics include spatial resolution, pollutants and health effect outcomes evaluated, and method for characterizing population exposure, as well as tool format, accessibility, complexity, and degree of peer review and application in policy contexts. While many of the tools use common data sources for concentration‐response associations, population, and baseline mortality rates, they vary in the exposure information source, format, and degree of technical complexity. We find that there is an important tradeoff between technical refinement and accessibility for a broad range of applications. Analysts should apply tools that provide the appropriate geographic scope, resolution, and maximum degree of technical rigor for the intended assessment, within resources constraints. A systematic intercomparison of the tools’ inputs, assumptions, calculations, and results would be helpful to determine the appropriateness of each for different types of assessment. Future work would benefit from accounting for multiple uncertainty sources and integrating ambient air pollution health impact assessment tools with those addressing other related health risks (e.g., smoking, indoor pollution, climate change, vehicle accidents, physical activity).

Suggested Citation

  • Susan C. Anenberg & Anna Belova & Jørgen Brandt & Neal Fann & Sue Greco & Sarath Guttikunda & Marie‐Eve Heroux & Fintan Hurley & Michal Krzyzanowski & Sylvia Medina & Brian Miller & Kiran Pandey & Joa, 2016. "Survey of Ambient Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment Tools," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(9), pages 1718-1736, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:9:p:1718-1736
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12540
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathilde Pascal & Magali Corso & Olivier Chanel & Christophe Declercq & Chiara Badaloni & Giulia Cesaroni & Susann Henschel & Kadri Meister & Daniela Haluza & Piedad Martin-Olmedo & Sylvia Medina, 2013. "Assessing the public health impacts of urban air pollution in 25 European cities: Results of the Aphekom project," Post-Print hal-01500894, HAL.
    2. Susann Henschel & Richard Atkinson & Ariana Zeka & Alain Tertre & Antonis Analitis & Klea Katsouyanni & Olivier Chanel & Mathilde Pascal & Bertil Forsberg & Sylvia Medina & Patrick Goodman, 2012. "Air pollution interventions and their impact on public health," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(5), pages 757-768, October.
    3. Alain Le Tertre & Joel Schwartz & Giota Touloumi, 2005. "Empirical Bayes and Adjusted Estimates Approach to Estimating the Relation of Mortality to Exposure of PM10," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 711-718, June.
    4. J. Jason West & Steven J. Smith & Raquel A. Silva & Vaishali Naik & Yuqiang Zhang & Zachariah Adelman & Meridith M. Fry & Susan Anenberg & Larry W. Horowitz & Jean-Francois Lamarque, 2013. "Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 885-889, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan I. Levy, 2016. "Fine Particulate Matter, Risk Assessment, and Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(9), pages 1745-1747, September.
    2. Marco Ravina & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2019. "Air Quality Planning and the Minimization of Negative Externalities," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Sipiwe Chihana & Jameson Mbale & Nchimunya Chaamwe, 2024. "Unveiling the Nexus: Sulphur Dioxide Exposure, Proximity to Mining, and Respiratory Illnesses in Kankoyo: A Mixed-Methods Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Yan Zhang & Hongguang Cheng & Di Huang & Chunbao Fu, 2021. "High Temporal Resolution Land Use Regression Models with POI Characteristics of the PM 2.5 Distribution in Beijing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Joana V. Barbosa & Rafael A. O. Nunes & Maria C. M. Alvim-Ferraz & Fernando G. Martins & Sofia I. V. Sousa, 2022. "Health and Economic Burden of the 2017 Portuguese Extreme Wildland Fires on Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Tavoos Hassan Bhat & Guo Jiawen & Hooman Farzaneh, 2021. "Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment (AP-HRA), Principles and Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, 2016. "Rethinking the Meaning of Concentration–Response Functions and the Estimated Burden of Adverse Health Effects Attributed to Exposure Concentrations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(9), pages 1770-1779, September.
    8. Kinnon, Michael Mac & Zhu, Shupeng & Carreras-Sospedra, Marc & Soukup, James V. & Dabdub, Donald & Samuelsen, G.S. & Brouwer, Jacob, 2019. "Considering future regional air quality impacts of the transportation sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 63-80.
    9. Tao Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Ying Li & Tai-Yu Lin, 2018. "Air Pollutant and Health-Efficiency Evaluation Based on a Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Vijay S. Limaye & Wolfgang Schöpp & Markus Amann, 2018. "Applying Integrated Exposure-Response Functions to PM 2.5 Pollution in India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tavoos Hassan Bhat & Guo Jiawen & Hooman Farzaneh, 2021. "Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment (AP-HRA), Principles and Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Luis Armando Becerra-Pérez & Roberto Alonso Ramos-Álvarez & Juan J. DelaCruz & Benjamín García-Páez & Federico Páez-Osuna & J. Guillermo Cedeño-Laurent & Elena Boldo, 2021. "An Economic Analysis of the Environmental Impact of PM 2.5 Exposure on Health Status in Three Northwestern Mexican Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Fábio T. F. Silva & Alexandre Szklo & Amanda Vinhoza & Ana Célia Nogueira & André F. P. Lucena & Antônio Marcos Mendonça & Camilla Marcolino & Felipe Nunes & Francielle M. Carvalho & Isabela Tagomori , 2022. "Inter-sectoral prioritization of climate technologies: insights from a Technology Needs Assessment for mitigation in Brazil," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 1-39, October.
    4. Jon Sampedro & Iñaki Arto & Mikel González-Eguino, 2017. "Implications of Switching Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Solar: A Case Study for the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Nelson, Tim & Pascoe, Owen & Calais, Prabpreet & Mitchell, Lily & McNeill, Judith, 2019. "Efficient integration of climate and energy policy in Australia’s National Electricity Market," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 178-193.
    6. Martha Maria Sander & Dieter Thomas Tietze, 2022. "Impacts of Traffic Infrastructure on Urban Bird Communities: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Milan Ščasný & Emanuele Massetti & Jan Melichar & Samuel Carrara, 2015. "Quantifying the Ancillary Benefits of the Representative Concentration Pathways on Air Quality in Europe," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(2), pages 383-415, October.
    8. Yongsheng Lin & Zhe Liu & Rui Liu & Xiaoman Yu & Liming Zhang, 2020. "Uncovering driving forces of co-benefits achieved by eco-industrial development strategies at the scale of industrial park," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(2), pages 275-290, March.
    9. World Bank Group, 2018. "Strategic Use of Climate Finance to Maximize Climate Action," World Bank Publications - Reports 30475, The World Bank Group.
    10. Huseynov, Samir & Palma, Marco A., 2018. "Does California’s LCFS Reduce CO2 Emissions?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274200, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Nabernegg, Stefan & Bednar-Friedl, Birgit & Muñoz, Pablo & Titz, Michaela & Vogel, Johanna, 2019. "National Policies for Global Emission Reductions: Effectiveness of Carbon Emission Reductions in International Supply Chains," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 146-157.
    12. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    13. Michael Cary, 2020. "Have greenhouse gas emissions from US energy production peaked? State level evidence from six subsectors," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 125-134, March.
    14. Poder, Thomas G. & He, Jie, 2017. "Willingness to pay for a cleaner car: The case of car pollution in Quebec and France," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 48-54.
    15. Zhang, Shaohui & Worrell, Ernst & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Krol, Maarten & de Bruine, Marco & Geng, Guangpo & Wagner, Fabian & Cofala, Janusz, 2016. "Modeling energy efficiency to improve air quality and health effects of China’s cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 574-593.
    16. Zhihua Xu & Jingzhu Shan, 2018. "The effect of risk perception on willingness to pay for reductions in the health risks posed by particulate matter 2.5: A case study of Beijing, China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(8), pages 1319-1337, December.
    17. Campagnolo, Lorenza & Davide, Marinella, 2019. "Can the Paris deal boost SDGs achievement? An assessment of climate mitigation co-benefits or side-effects on poverty and inequality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 96-109.
    18. Annunziata Faustini & Marina Davoli, 2020. "Attributable Risk to Assess the Health Impact of Air Pollution: Advances, Controversies, State of the Art and Future Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Alexander R. Barron & Allen A. Fawcett & Marc A. C. Hafstead & James R. Mcfarland & Adele C. Morris, 2018. "Policy Insights From The Emf 32 Study On U.S. Carbon Tax Scenarios," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(01), pages 1-47, February.
    20. Joana Portugal-Pereira & Alexandre Koberle & André F. P. Lucena & Pedro R. R. Rochedo & Mariana Império & Ana Monteiro Carsalade & Roberto Schaeffer & Peter Rafaj, 2018. "Interactions between global climate change strategies and local air pollution: lessons learnt from the expansion of the power sector in Brazil," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 293-309, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:9:p:1718-1736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.