IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v35y2015i3p409-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample Size Allocation for Food Item Radiation Monitoring and Safety Inspection

Author

Listed:
  • Mayumi Seto
  • Koichiro Uriu

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify a procedure for determining sample size allocation for food radiation inspections of more than one food item to minimize the potential risk to consumers of internal radiation exposure. We consider a simplified case of food radiation monitoring and safety inspection in which a risk manager is required to monitor two food items, milk and spinach, in a contaminated area. Three protocols for food radiation monitoring with different sample size allocations were assessed by simulating random sampling and inspections of milk and spinach in a conceptual monitoring site. Distributions of 131I and radiocesium concentrations were determined in reference to 131I and radiocesium concentrations detected in Fukushima prefecture, Japan, for March and April 2011. The results of the simulations suggested that a protocol that allocates sample size to milk and spinach based on the estimation of 131I and radiocesium concentrations using the apparent decay rate constants sequentially calculated from past monitoring data can most effectively minimize the potential risks of internal radiation exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayumi Seto & Koichiro Uriu, 2015. "Sample Size Allocation for Food Item Radiation Monitoring and Safety Inspection," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 409-422, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:3:p:409-422
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark R. Powell, 2013. "The Economic Efficiency of Sampling Size: The Case of Beef Trim Revisited," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 385-396, March.
    2. Mark R. Powell & Maarten Nauta & Don Schaffner & Marcel Zwietering, 2013. "Regarding “The Economic Efficiency of Sampling Size: The Case of Beef Trim”," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 350-352, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mayumi Seto & Koichiro Uriu & Isao Kawaguchi & Hiroyuki Yokomizo, 2018. "Assessment of Instructions on Protection Against Food Contaminated with Radiocesium in Japan in 2011," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(6), pages 1154-1168, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ollinger, Michael & Houser, Matthew, 2020. "Ground beef recalls and subsequent food safety performance," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Peyton M. Ferrier & Jean C. Buzby, 2013. "Response to Mark Powell's Comments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 353-355, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:3:p:409-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.