IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v33y2013i1p54-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Look at State‐Level Risk Assessment in the United States: Making Decisions in the Absence of Federal Risk Values

Author

Listed:
  • Diana G. Effio
  • Oliver Kroner
  • Andrew Maier
  • William Hayes
  • Alison Willis
  • Joan Strawson

Abstract

State environmental agencies in the United States are charged with making risk management decisions that protect public health and the environment while managing limited technical, financial, and human resources. Meanwhile, the federal risk assessment community that provides risk assessment guidance to state agencies is challenged by the rapid growth of the global chemical inventory. When chemical toxicity profiles are unavailable on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System or other federal resources, each state agency must act independently to identify and select appropriate chemical risk values for application in human health risk assessment. This practice can lead to broad interstate variation in the toxicity values selected for any one chemical. Within this context, this article describes the decision‐making process and resources used by the federal government and individual U.S. states. The risk management of trichloroethylene (TCE) in the United States is presented as a case study to demonstrate the need for a collaborative approach among U.S. states toward identification and selection of chemical risk values while awaiting federal risk values to be set. The regulatory experience with TCE is contrasted with collaborative risk science models, such as the European Union's efforts in risk assessment harmonization. Finally, we introduce State Environmental Agency Risk Collaboration for Harmonization, a free online interactive tool designed to help to create a collaborative network among state agencies to provide a vehicle for efficiently sharing information and resources, and for the advancement of harmonization in risk values used among U.S. states when federal guidance is unavailable.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana G. Effio & Oliver Kroner & Andrew Maier & William Hayes & Alison Willis & Joan Strawson, 2013. "A Look at State‐Level Risk Assessment in the United States: Making Decisions in the Absence of Federal Risk Values," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 54-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:1:p:54-67
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01842.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01842.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01842.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Holman & Royce Francis & George Gray, 2017. "Part I––Comparing Noncancer Chronic Human Health Reference Values: An Analysis of Science Policy Choices," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 861-878, May.
    2. Elizabeth Holman & Royce Francis & George Gray, 2017. "Part II: Quantitative Evaluation of Choices Used in Setting Noncancer Chronic Human Health Reference Values Across Organizations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 879-892, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:1:p:54-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.