IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v32y2012i3p433-447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta‐Analysis of Mass‐Balance Studies of Soil Ingestion in Children

Author

Listed:
  • Edward J. Stanek III
  • Edward J. Calabrese
  • Bo Xu

Abstract

Ingestion of soil by young children may be an important source of exposure to environmental contaminants. Estimates of soil ingestion have been made by several studies using trace elements in a mass‐balance approach, but differ substantially between studies and trace elements. We conduct a meta‐analysis of four major mass‐balance soil ingestion studies conducted on children between one and seven in the summer/fall in the northern United States. The analysis takes advantage of primary data from all studies, and provides a more complete description of soil ingestion among children. The meta‐analysis uses data based on the two most reliable trace elements, Al and Si, that have passed a screening to identify and exclude measures with a high likelihood of bias. Details are described in a companion paper. The best linear unbiased predictor is used in a mixed model to estimate soil ingestion for study subjects. Overall, 11% of subject‐periods are identified as outliers and excluded from the analysis. An analysis on 216 children based on Al and Si as tracer elements indicates that the mean (median) soil ingestion is 26 mg/day (33 mg/day), with the 95th percentile estimated as 79 mg/day. This systematic approach provides more reliable estimates than individual study results. There is some evidence that soil ingestion increases with a child's age, but insufficient data to distinguish soil ingestion by gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward J. Stanek III & Edward J. Calabrese & Bo Xu, 2012. "Meta‐Analysis of Mass‐Balance Studies of Soil Ingestion in Children," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 433-447, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:32:y:2012:i:3:p:433-447
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01673.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01673.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01673.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly M. Thompson & David E. Burmaster, 1991. "Parametric Distributions for Soil Ingestion by Children," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 339-342, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maged M. Hamed & Philip B. Bedient, 1997. "On the Effect of Probability Distributions of Input Variables in Public Health Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 97-105, February.
    2. Dale Hattis & David E. Burmaster, 1994. "Assessment of Variability and Uncertainty Distributions for Practical Risk Analyses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(5), pages 713-730, October.
    3. Edward J. Stanek III & Bo Xu & Edward J. Calabrese, 2012. "Equation Reliability of Soil Ingestion Estimates in Mass‐Balance Soil Ingestion Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 448-463, March.
    4. Kimberly M. Thompson & David E. Burmaster & Edmund A.C. Crouch3, 1992. "Monte Carlo Techniques for Quantitative Uncertainty Analysis in Public Health Risk Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 53-63, March.
    5. Wout Slob, 1994. "Uncertainty Analysis in Multiplicative Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 571-576, August.
    6. S.Y. Jimmy Chan, 1993. "An Alternative Approach to the Modeling of Probability Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 97-102, February.
    7. Michael R. Adams & Cynthia A. Hanna & Janet A. Mayernik & William M. Mendez, 1994. "Probabilistic Health Risk Assessment for Exposures to Estuary Sediments and Biota Contaminated with Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Polychlorinated Terphenyls and Other Toxic Substances," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 577-594, August.
    8. Halûk Özkaynak & Jianping Xue & Valerie G. Zartarian & Graham Glen & Luther Smith, 2011. "Modeled Estimates of Soil and Dust Ingestion Rates for Children," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 592-608, April.
    9. Brent Finley & Dennis Paustenbach, 1994. "The Benefits of Probabilistic Exposure Assessment: Three Case Studies Involving Contaminated Air, Water, and Soil," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 53-73, February.
    10. Harold F. Hemond & Helena M. Solo‐Gabriele, 2004. "Children's Exposure to Arsenic from CCA‐Treated Wooden Decks and Playground Structures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 51-64, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:32:y:2012:i:3:p:433-447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.