IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v26y2006i3p671-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interference Phenomena in Temporal Evolution of Accident Probability in Workplaces

Author

Listed:
  • Antonis Targoutzidis
  • Lila Antonopoulou

Abstract

The aim of this article is to investigate some implications of complexity in workplace risk assessment. Workplace is examined as a complex system, and some of its attributes and aspects of its behavior are investigated. Failure probability of various workplace elements is examined as a time variable and interference phenomena of these probabilities are presented. Potential inefficiencies of common perceptions in applying probabilistic risk assessment models are also discussed. This investigation is conducted through mathematical modeling and qualitative examples of workplace situations. A mathematical model for simulation of the evolution of workplace accident probability in time is developed. Its findings are then attempted to be translated in real‐world terms and discussed through simple examples of workplace situations. The mathematical model indicates that workplace is more likely to exhibit an unpredictable behavior. Such a behavior raises issues about usual key assumptions for the workplace, such as aggregation. Chaotic phenomena (nonlinear feedback mechanisms) are also investigated for in simple workplace systems cases. The main conclusions are (1) that time is an important variable for risk assessment, since behavior patterns are complex and unpredictable in the long term and (2) that workplace risk identification should take place in a holistic view (not by work post).

Suggested Citation

  • Antonis Targoutzidis & Lila Antonopoulou, 2006. "Interference Phenomena in Temporal Evolution of Accident Probability in Workplaces," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 671-682, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:26:y:2006:i:3:p:671-682
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00764.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00764.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00764.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Vernez & Didier R. Buchs & Guillaume E. Pierrehumbert & Adel Besrour, 2004. "MORM—A Petri Net Based Model for Assessing OH&S Risks in Industrial Processes: Modeling Qualitative Aspects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1719-1735, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:26:y:2006:i:3:p:671-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.