IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v24y2004i6p1719-1735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MORM—A Petri Net Based Model for Assessing OH&S Risks in Industrial Processes: Modeling Qualitative Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • David Vernez
  • Didier R. Buchs
  • Guillaume E. Pierrehumbert
  • Adel Besrour

Abstract

Because of the increase in workplace automation and the diversification of industrial processes, workplaces have become more and more complex. The classical approaches used to address workplace hazard concerns, such as checklists or sequence models, are, therefore, of limited use in such complex systems. Moreover, because of the multifaceted nature of workplaces, the use of single‐oriented methods, such as AEA (man oriented), FMEA (system oriented), or HAZOP (process oriented), is not satisfactory. The use of a dynamic modeling approach in order to allow multiple‐oriented analyses may constitute an alternative to overcome this limitation. The qualitative modeling aspects of the MORM (man‐machine occupational risk modeling) model are discussed in this article. The model, realized on an object‐oriented Petri net tool (CO‐OPN), has been developed to simulate and analyze industrial processes in an OH&S perspective. The industrial process is modeled as a set of interconnected subnets (state spaces), which describe its constitutive machines. Process‐related factors are introduced, in an explicit way, through machine interconnections and flow properties. While man‐machine interactions are modeled as triggering events for the state spaces of the machines, the CREAM cognitive behavior model is used in order to establish the relevant triggering events. In the CO‐OPN formalism, the model is expressed as a set of interconnected CO‐OPN objects defined over data types expressing the measure attached to the flow of entities transiting through the machines. Constraints on the measures assigned to these entities are used to determine the state changes in each machine. Interconnecting machines implies the composition of such flow and consequently the interconnection of the measure constraints. This is reflected by the construction of constraint enrichment hierarchies, which can be used for simulation and analysis optimization in a clear mathematical framework. The use of Petri nets to perform multiple‐oriented analysis opens perspectives in the field of industrial risk management. It may significantly reduce the duration of the assessment process. But, most of all, it opens perspectives in the field of risk comparisons and integrated risk management. Moreover, because of the generic nature of the model and tool used, the same concepts and patterns may be used to model a wide range of systems and application fields.

Suggested Citation

  • David Vernez & Didier R. Buchs & Guillaume E. Pierrehumbert & Adel Besrour, 2004. "MORM—A Petri Net Based Model for Assessing OH&S Risks in Industrial Processes: Modeling Qualitative Aspects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1719-1735, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:1719-1735
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00562.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00562.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00562.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonis Targoutzidis & Lila Antonopoulou, 2006. "Interference Phenomena in Temporal Evolution of Accident Probability in Workplaces," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 671-682, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:1719-1735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.