IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v23y2003i1p1-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Precautionary Principle Versus Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chauncey Starr

Abstract

Precautionary behavior serves a valuable protective purpose as a first response to the new. It causes a quick retreat to the safety of the familiar; it provides time for a realistic “friend or foe” assessment of a new event. This rational assessment is often delayed by the sluggishness of government bureaucratic processes, or stopped by an implied challenge to a status quo. At the public level, reassurance may be slow to overcome an early uncertainty. However, a precautionary response does not provide an operational governing principle, although it makes publicly plausible an indefinite concealment of de facto political actions, or nonaction. The alternative of rational decision making at the policy level should flow from a comparative benefit/cost/risk analysis. Such early risk analyses have pragmatic uncertainties based on the limited available knowledge base and, accordingly, require judgmental application.

Suggested Citation

  • Chauncey Starr, 2003. "The Precautionary Principle Versus Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 1-3, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:1-3
    DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1539-6924.00285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalina Kavaldzhieva, 2016. "Efficiency of the Capital Invested in Oncological Care Measured by Social Affordability," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 83-92, March.
    2. Dowie, Jack, 2021. "The Best Principle is the best principle," SocArXiv q4keh, Center for Open Science.
    3. Turvey, Calum G. & Mojduszka, Eliza M., 2005. "The Precautionary Principle and the law of unintended consequences," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 145-161, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:1-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.