IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v14y1994i4p613-627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applications of Multinomial Dose‐Response Models in Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • D. Krewski
  • Y. Zhu

Abstract

Reproductive and developmental anomalies induced by toxic chemicals may be identified using laboratory experiments with small mammalian species such as rats, mice, and rabbits. In this paper, dose‐response models for correlated multinomial data arising in studies of developmental toxicity are discussed. These models provide a joint characterization of dose‐response relationships for both embryolethality and teratogenicity. Generalized estimating equations are used for model fitting, incorporating overdispersion relative to the multinomial variation due to correlation among littermates. The fitted dose‐response models are used to estimate benchmark doses in a series of experiments conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Joint analysis of prenatal death and fetal malformation using an extended Dirichlet‐trinomial covariance function to characterize overdispersion appears to have statistical and computational advantages over separate analysis of these two end points. Benchmark doses based on overall toxicity are below the minimum of those for prenatal death and fetal malformation and may, thus, be preferred for risk assessment purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Krewski & Y. Zhu, 1994. "Applications of Multinomial Dose‐Response Models in Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 613-627, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:14:y:1994:i:4:p:613-627
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00275.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00275.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00275.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louise Ryan, 1992. "The Use of Generalized Estimating Equations for Risk Assessment in Developmental Toxicity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 439-447, September.
    2. Ralph L. Kodell & Richard B. Howe & James J. Chen & David W. Gaylor, 1991. "Mathematical Modeling of Reproductive and Developmental Toxic Effects for Quantitative Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 583-590, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Krewski & Robert Smythe & Karen Y. Fung, 2002. "Optimal Designs for Estimating the Effective Dose in Developmental Toxicity Experiments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 1195-1205, December.
    2. Terra L. Slaton & Walter W. Piegorsch & Stephen D. Durham, 2000. "Estimation and Testing with Overdispersed Proportions Using the Beta-Logistic Regression Model of Heckman and Willis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 125-133, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel O. Scharfstein & Paige L. Williams, 1994. "Design of Developmental Toxicity Studies for Assessing Joint Effects of Dose and Duration," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(6), pages 1057-1071, December.
    2. D. Krewski & Y. Zhu, 1995. "A Simple Data Transformation for Estimating Benchmark Doses in Developmental Toxicity Experiments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 29-39, February.
    3. Paul Catalano & Louise Ryan & Daniel Scharfstein, 1994. "Modeling Fetal Death and Malformation in Developmental Toxicity Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 629-637, August.
    4. Martha Contreras & Louise M. Ryan, 2000. "Fitting Nonlinear and Constrained Generalized Estimating Equations with Optimization Software," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1268-1271, December.
    5. Terra L. Slaton & Walter W. Piegorsch & Stephen D. Durham, 2000. "Estimation and Testing with Overdispersed Proportions Using the Beta-Logistic Regression Model of Heckman and Willis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 125-133, March.
    6. Mehdi Razzaghi & Ralph Kodell, 2004. "Quantitative Risk Assessment for Developmental Neurotoxic Effects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1673-1681, December.
    7. Daniel Krewski & Robert Smythe & Karen Y. Fung, 2002. "Optimal Designs for Estimating the Effective Dose in Developmental Toxicity Experiments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 1195-1205, December.
    8. Julie S. Najita & Paul J. Catalano, 2013. "On Determining the BMD from Multiple Outcomes in Developmental Toxicity Studies when One Outcome is Intentionally Missing," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1500-1509, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:14:y:1994:i:4:p:613-627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.