IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v12y1992i3p339-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk to Groundlings of Death Due to Airplane Accidents: A Risk Communication Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard D. Goldstein
  • Michele Demak
  • Mary Northridge
  • Daniel Wartenberg

Abstract

During the period 1975‐85 in the United States the 70 year lifetime risk of dying from being hit by an airplane when the individual is on the ground was 4.2 per million people. In contrast to many other risks used for comparison purposes, risk to those on the ground from an airplane crash is not a function of our own skills; is not optional; provides no benefit to anyone involved; and is not an act of nature. As a risk comparison tool it also has the useful characteristics of being something about which we can agree that regulatory action, such as control of airplane use and traffic, is warranted; but that no significant change in personal behavior, such as living in the basement to protect against dying from a plane hitting the home, is commensurate with the extent of risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard D. Goldstein & Michele Demak & Mary Northridge & Daniel Wartenberg, 1992. "Risk to Groundlings of Death Due to Airplane Accidents: A Risk Communication Tool," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 339-341, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:12:y:1992:i:3:p:339-341
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00685.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00685.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00685.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kimberly M. Thompson, 2002. "Variability and Uncertainty Meet Risk Management and Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 647-654, June.
    2. John D. Graham, 1994. "Time for Congress to Embrace Risk Analysis?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 139-142, April.
    3. Carl F. Cranor & Adam M. Finkel, 2018. "Toward the usable recognition of individual benefits and costs in regulatory analysis and governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 131-149, March.
    4. Stroup Richard L., 1996. "Property Rights, Justice and Efficient Environmental Policy," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2-3), pages 211-238, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:12:y:1992:i:3:p:339-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.