IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v33y2013i5p357-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Donorship To Ownership? Budget Support And Donor Influence In Rwanda And Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Haley J. Swedlund

Abstract

SUMMARY In this article, I analyze the relationship between budget support and ownership, or recipient‐country control over policy outcomes, by exploring how budget support donors in Rwanda and Tanzania attempt to exert influence over domestic policy processes. In contrast to the conventional rhetoric about budget support, my empirical analysis finds little evidence that budget support decreases the influence that donors try to exert over recipient‐country governments. Instead, semi‐structured interviews with donor and government representatives in each country suggest that the aid modality is often used as a tool by which donors attempt to increase their leverage over domestic decision‐making. In particular, I identify three mechanisms frequently used by budget support donors to influence domestic policy processes: voice amplification, a seat at the table, and a license to ask questions. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Haley J. Swedlund, 2013. "From Donorship To Ownership? Budget Support And Donor Influence In Rwanda And Tanzania," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(5), pages 357-370, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:357-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susana Neves Alves, 2021. "Everyday states and water infrastructure: Insights from a small secondary city in Africa, Bafatá in Guinea-Bissau," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(2), pages 247-264, March.
    2. Pablo Yanguas, 2016. "The role and responsibility of foreign aid in recipient political settlements," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-056-16, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Haley J. Swedlund & Malte Lierl, 2021. "To understand the implications of different aid modalities, we need to analyse the bargaining logic between donors and recipient governments," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(6), pages 1036-1039, November.
    4. van de Kuilen, Hester S. & Altinyelken, Hulya Kosar & Voogt, Joke M. & Nzabalirwa, Wenceslas, 2019. "Policy adoption of learner-centred pedagogy in Rwanda: A case study of its rationale and transfer mechanisms," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 64-72.
    5. Carlitz, Ruth D., 2017. "Money Flows, Water Trickles: Understanding Patterns of Decentralized Water Provision in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 16-30.
    6. Yanguas, Pablo & Hulme, David, 2015. "Barriers to Political Analysis in Aid Bureaucracies: From Principle to Practice in DFID and the World Bank," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 209-219.
    7. Zunera Ahmad Rana & Dirk‐Jan Koch, 2022. "What happens to aid fungibility when the recipient government takes control? Effects of aid ownership in Rwanda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    8. Gore, Christopher D. & Brass, Jennifer N. & Baldwin, Elizabeth & MacLean, Lauren M., 2019. "Political autonomy and resistance in electricity sector liberalization in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 193-209.
    9. Tim Röthel, 2023. "Budget support to the health sector—The right choice for strong institutions? Evidence from panel data," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 735-770, May.
    10. Geske Dijkstra, 2021. "Not such a good bargain for (the evidence on) budget support," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(6), pages 1031-1035, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:357-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.