IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v20y2018i4p509-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Stress‐Related Growth Scale: Short Form in undergraduate nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Li
  • Su‐Wei Wang
  • Jing‐Jing Zhou
  • Qing‐Zhuo Ren
  • Yu‐Lin Gao

Abstract

In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Stress‐Related Growth Scale–Short Form (SRGS‐SF) for undergraduate nursing students. Using a cross‐sectional design, a convenience sample of 253 undergraduate nursing students was included in this study. Half of the sample (n = 126) was randomly selected to explore the factorial structure of the SRGS‐SF via exploratory factor analysis. The rest of the sample (n = 127) was selected to confirm the structure via confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that the Chinese version of the SRGS‐SF consisted of two factors: interpersonal and intrapersonal growth. The scale also had the power to discriminate between undergraduate nursing students with high and low levels of stress‐related growth (SRG). The internal consistency and stability of the scale were also adequate. The Chinese version of the SRGS‐SF is a valid and reliable measurement for assessing SRG among undergraduate nursing students. One suitable application would be the evaluation of the process underpinning SRG and the effectiveness of interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Li & Su‐Wei Wang & Jing‐Jing Zhou & Qing‐Zhuo Ren & Yu‐Lin Gao, 2018. "Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Stress‐Related Growth Scale: Short Form in undergraduate nursing students," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 509-515, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:509-515
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12544
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mien Li Goh & Emily NK Ang & Yiong‐Huak Chan & Hong‐Gu He & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2015. "Psychometric testing of the Revised Humane Caring Scale for adult patients in Singapore," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 370-376, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rong Tan & Kaiyan Luo & Deying Hu & Yue Zhao & Yanhong Han & Ke Xu, 2020. "Inpatient Suicide Second Victim Experience and Support Tool: Psychometric properties of a scale for nurses who experienced inpatient suicide at Chinese general hospitals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1111-1120, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annamaria Bagnasco & Milko Zanini & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Fiona Timmins & Miss Carolina Galanti & Giuseppe Aleo & Gianluca Catania & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1832-1857, June.
    2. Mien Li Goh & Emily N. K. Ang & Yiong-Huak Chan & Hong-Gu He & Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen, 2018. "Patient Satisfaction Is Linked to Nursing Workload in a Singapore Hospital," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(6), pages 692-713, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:509-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.