IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v17y2015i3p280-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes to a robot bathtub in Danish elder care: A hermeneutic interview study

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten Beedholm
  • Kirsten Frederiksen
  • Anne‐Marie Skovsgaard Frederiksen
  • Kirsten Lomborg

Abstract

In Western countries, assistive technology is implemented on a large scale in elder care settings. Only a few studies have attempted to explore the different attitudes to assistive technology among various groups of users. In this study, we investigated and explained the different attitudes among the involved leaders, nursing staff, and older people to a newly‐implemented robot bathtub. Qualitative analyses of eight interviews with managers, nursing staff, and the older users revealed that the informants focused on different aspects (process, values, and functionality, respectively), used different implicit quality criteria, and ascribed different symbolic significance to the robot bathtub. Thus, the study demonstrated how attitudes toward the robot bathtub were connected to the informants’ institutional role. The findings challenge the current paradigm, where technology is expected to operate as a passive tool, simply facilitating desired human acts and interactions. Further studies drawing on the epistemological and ontological perceptions of science technology studies are needed in order to understand human rationalities in the assistive technology context and to offer new insights into how technology “works” in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten Beedholm & Kirsten Frederiksen & Anne‐Marie Skovsgaard Frederiksen & Kirsten Lomborg, 2015. "Attitudes to a robot bathtub in Danish elder care: A hermeneutic interview study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 280-286, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:17:y:2015:i:3:p:280-286
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Pammolli & Massimo Riccaboni & Laura Magazzini, 2012. "The sustainability of European health care systems: beyond income and aging," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(5), pages 623-634, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lisa Korsbakke Emtekær Hæsum & Lars Ehlers & Ole K. Hejlesen, 2016. "Interaction between functional health literacy and telehomecare: Short‐term effects from a randomized trial," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 328-333, September.
    2. Mandy M. Archibald & Alan Barnard, 2018. "Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2473-2480, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pammolli, Fabio & Salerno, Nicola, 2011. "Le differenze regionali nella governance della spesa sanitaria. La sanità alla sfide del federalismo: il modello SaniRegio di CeRM [Regional differences in the governance of health care expenditure," MPRA Paper 36934, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Sónia Morgado, 2014. "Does health promote economic growth? Portuguese case study: from dictatorship to full democracy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(6), pages 591-598, July.
    3. Allen, Nicola & Pichler, Franz & Wang, Tina & Patel, Sundip & Salek, Sam, 2013. "Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 305-312.
    4. Lakomaa, Erik & Sanandaji, Tino, 2017. "Can Community Driven Care be integrated in the European Welfare System? Institutional Challenges and Historical Lessons," SSE Working Paper Series in Economic History 2017:3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    5. Joohun Han & Chanjin Chung, 2021. "Impact of Aging and Underemployment on Income Disparity between Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Carla Blazquez-Fernandez & David Cantarero & Patricio Perez, 2014. "Disentangling the heterogeneous income elasticity and dynamics of health expenditure," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(16), pages 1839-1854, June.
    7. José Castillo-Manzano & Mercedes Castro-Nuño & Xavier Fageda, 2014. "Can health public expenditure reduce the tragic consequences of road traffic accidents? The EU-27 experience," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(6), pages 645-652, July.
    8. Michael Osti & Johannes Steyrer, 2017. "A perspective on the health care expenditures for defensive medicine," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(4), pages 399-404, May.
    9. Renuga Nagarajan & Aurora A.C. Teixeira & Sandra T. Silva, 2013. "The impact of population ageing on economic growth: an in-depth bibliometric analysis," FEP Working Papers 505, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    10. Fabio Pammolli & Nicola Carmine Salerno, 2011. "Le differenze regionali nella governance della spesa sanitaria - SaniRegio-2011," Working Papers CERM 02-2011, Competitività, Regole, Mercati (CERM).
    11. Mihaela Tofan & Mihaela Onofrei & Anca-Florentina Vatamanu, 2020. "Fiscal Responsibility Legal Framework—New Paradigm for Fiscal Discipline in the EU," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Héctor Bellido & Lorena Olmos & Juan Antonio Román-Aso, 2019. "Do political factors influence public health expenditures? Evidence pre- and post-great recession," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(3), pages 455-474, April.
    13. Di Matteo, Livio & Cantarero-Prieto, David, 2018. "The Determinants of Public Health Expenditures: Comparing Canada and Spain," MPRA Paper 87800, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. José Villaverde & Adolfo Maza & María Hierro, 2014. "Health care expenditure disparities in the European Union and underlying factors: a distribution dynamics approach," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 251-268, September.
    15. Munjae Lee & Sewon Park & Kyu-Sung Lee, 2019. "What Are the Features of Successful Medical Device Start-Ups? Evidence from KOREA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Lakomaa, Erik & Sanandaji, Tino, 2017. "Integrating community driven care service in European welfare states – nonprofit institutional entrepreneurship as driver for expanding access," SSE Working Paper Series in Economic History 2017:5, Stockholm School of Economics.
    17. Rocco Palumbo, 2020. "Improving Health Professionals’ Involvement Whilst Sustaining Work–Life Balance: Evidence from an Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Sanandaji, Tino & Lakomaa, Erik, 2016. "Care, Commons and Entrepreneurship," SSE Working Paper Series in Economic History 2016:2, Stockholm School of Economics.
    19. Renuga Nagarajan & Aurora A. C. Teixeira & Sandra Silva, 2017. "The Impact Of Population Ageing On Economic Growth: A Bibliometric Survey," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 62(02), pages 275-296, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:17:y:2015:i:3:p:280-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.