IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2473-2480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care

Author

Listed:
  • Mandy M. Archibald
  • Alan Barnard

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the concept of futurism and the emergence of robotics in relation to the fundamentals of care, highlighting how nurses need a more anticipatory and contemporary position towards technology to maintain relevance in the future. Background The future of nursing in Western countries will soon be linked with the emergence of robotics for efficient and cost‐effective provision of fundamental care. Their emergence and roles with care of the body and more broadly assisting people with their daily living activities has enormous implications for the profession and health care. Despite this importance, how nursing understands and will respond to technological trends and developments is insufficiently reflected in the professions discourse. Design A discursive article. Methods Literature from nursing fundamentals of care/fundamental care, information science, technology, humanities and philosophy informed the arguments in this article. Conclusions This article examines the intersection of futurism and the fundamentals of care, and how adopting an anticipatory and posthuman perspective towards technological‐care integration is necessary amidst a robot revolution in the techno‐era. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses are currently challenged to understand, prioritise and deliver fundamental care. Health systems are challenged by a lack of care predicated by shortfalls in skilled staff and deficiencies in staff mobilisation. Both challenges can be compounded or alleviated by further integration of technology, but to maximise benefit requires forethought and understanding. This article can help open needed dialogue around planning for the future and is a call to action for the nursing profession to conceptualise its position on exponential technological growth and fundamental care provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Mandy M. Archibald & Alan Barnard, 2018. "Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2473-2480, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2473-2480
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsten Beedholm & Kirsten Frederiksen & Anne‐Marie Skovsgaard Frederiksen & Kirsten Lomborg, 2015. "Attitudes to a robot bathtub in Danish elder care: A hermeneutic interview study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 280-286, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sari Mansour & Sarah Nogues, 2022. "Advantages of and Barriers to Crafting New Technology in Healthcare Organizations: A Qualitative Study in the COVID-19 Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Tom Brandsma & Jol Stoffers & Ilse Schrijver, 2020. "Advanced Technology Use by Care Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Geraldine Crilly & Maura Dowling & Isabelle Delaunois & Mary Flavin & Linda Biesty, 2019. "Critical care nurses' experiences of providing care for adults in a highly technological environment: A qualitative evidence synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4250-4263, December.
    4. Jina Yang & Kon Hee Kim, 2022. "Effect of the Strategic Thinking, Problem Solving Skills, and Grit on the Disaster Triage Ability of Emergency Room Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, January.
    5. May Bazzi & Maud Lundèn & Karin Ahlberg & Ingegerd Bergbom & Mikael Hellström & Solveig M. Lundgren & Isabell Fridh, 2020. "Patients’ lived experiences of waiting for and undergoing endovascular aortic repair in a hybrid operating room: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 810-820, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Korsbakke Emtekær Hæsum & Lars Ehlers & Ole K. Hejlesen, 2016. "Interaction between functional health literacy and telehomecare: Short‐term effects from a randomized trial," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 328-333, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2473-2480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.