IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v49y2002i8p723-742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) as an information duel

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy C. Barkdoll
  • Donald P. Gaver
  • Kevin D. Glazebrook
  • Patricia A. Jacobs
  • Sergio Posadas

Abstract

Blue strike aircraft enter region ℛ to attack Red targets. In Case 1, Blue conducts (preplanned) SEAD to establish air superiority. In the (reactive) SEAD scenario, which is Case 2, such superiority is already in place, but is jeopardized by prohibitive interference from Red, which threatens Blue's ability to conduct missions. We utilize both deterministic and stochastic models to explore optimal tactics for Red in such engagements. Policies are developed which will guide both Red's determination of the modes of operation of his engagement radar, and his choice of Blue opponent to target next. An index in the form of a simple transaction kill ratio plays a major role throughout. Published 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 49: 723–742, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/nav.10046

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy C. Barkdoll & Donald P. Gaver & Kevin D. Glazebrook & Patricia A. Jacobs & Sergio Posadas, 2002. "Suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) as an information duel," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(8), pages 723-742, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:49:y:2002:i:8:p:723-742
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.10046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10046
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.10046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. E. Pilnick & K. D. Glazebrook & D. P. Gaver, 1991. "Optimal sequential replenishment of ships during combat," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 637-668, October.
    2. Gad Manor & Moshe Kress, 1997. "Optimality of the greedy shooting strategy in the presence of incomplete damage information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(7), pages 613-622, October.
    3. Michael P. Bailey, 1992. "Measuring Performance of Integrated Air Defense Networks Using Stochastic Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 647-659, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin Glazebrook & Alan Washburn, 2004. "Shoot-Look-Shoot: A Review and Extension," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 454-463, June.
    2. Connor McLemore & Donald Gaver & Patricia Jacobs, 2016. "A model for geographically distributed combat interactions of swarming naval and air forces," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(7), pages 562-576, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. D. Glazebrook & C. Kirkbride & H. M. Mitchell & D. P. Gaver & P. A. Jacobs, 2007. "Index Policies for Shooting Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 769-781, August.
    2. Mofidi, Seyed Shahab & Pazour, Jennifer A. & Roy, Debjit, 2018. "Proactive vs. reactive order-fulfillment resource allocation for sea-based logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 66-84.
    3. Ahmet Silav & Esra Karasakal & Orhan Karasakal, 2022. "Bi-objective dynamic weapon-target assignment problem with stability measure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 1229-1247, April.
    4. Kevin Glazebrook & Alan Washburn, 2004. "Shoot-Look-Shoot: A Review and Extension," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 454-463, June.
    5. Ahmet Silav & Orhan Karasakal & Esra Karasakal, 2019. "Bi‐objective missile rescheduling for a naval task group with dynamic disruptions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 596-615, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:49:y:2002:i:8:p:723-742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.