IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v32y2011ip481-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has the November Effect Replaced the January Effect in Stock Markets?

Author

Listed:
  • Ling T. He
  • Shao C. He

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling T. He & Shao C. He, 2011. "Has the November Effect Replaced the January Effect in Stock Markets?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32, pages 481-486, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:32:y:2011:i::p:481-486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Easterday, Kathryn E. & Sen, Pradyot K., 2016. "Is the January effect rational? Insights from the accounting valuation model," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 168-185.
    2. Meher Shiva Tadepalli & Ravi Kumar Jain, 2018. "Persistence of calendar anomalies: insights and perspectives from literature," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(1/2), pages 18-60, May.
    3. Anthony Yanxiang Gu, 2019. "Strong March Phenomenon and Weak January Effect in the U.S. Bond Market," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(1), pages 193-193, February.
    4. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E., 2014. "Resurrecting the size effect: Evidence from a panel nonlinear cointegration model for the G7 stock markets," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 46-53.
    5. Lijuan Zhang & Mark Wilson, 2018. "Does the accruals quality premium arise from information risk?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 599-632, June.
    6. Gerardo ¡°Gerry¡± Alfonso Perez, 2018. "Does the January Effect Still Exists?," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 50-73, January.
    7. Anthony Yanxiang Gu, 2015. "The June Phenomenon and the Changing Month of the Year Effect," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 1-1, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:32:y:2011:i::p:481-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.