IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v33y2014i3p623-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Rehabilitation and Counseling Services on the Labor Market Activity of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) Beneficiaries

Author

Listed:
  • Robert R. Weathers II
  • Michelle Stegman Bailey

Abstract

We use data from a social experiment to estimate the impact of a rehabilitation and counseling program on the labor market activity of newly entitled Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries. Our results indicate that the program led to a 4.6 percentage point increase in the receipt of employment services within the first year following random assignment and a 5.1 percentage point increase in participation in the Social Security Administration's Ticket to Work program within the first three years following random assignment. The program led to a 5.3 percentage point increase, or almost 50 percent increase, in employment, and an $831 increase in annual earnings in the second calendar year after the calendar year of random assignment. The employment and earnings impacts are smaller and not statistically significant in the third calendar year following random assignment, and we describe SSDI rules that are consistent with this finding. Our findings indicate that disability reform proposals focusing on restoring the work capacity of people with disabilities can increase the disability employment rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert R. Weathers II & Michelle Stegman Bailey, 2014. "The Impact of Rehabilitation and Counseling Services on the Labor Market Activity of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) Beneficiaries," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 623-648, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:33:y:2014:i:3:p:623-648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/pam.21763
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marios Michaelides & Peter Mueser, 2020. "The Labor Market Effects of US Reemployment Policy: Lessons from an Analysis of Four Programs during the Great Recession," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(4), pages 1099-1140.
    2. Daniel Gubits & Judy Geyer & Denise Hoffman & Sarah Croake & Utsav Kattel & David Judkins & Stephen Bell & David Stapleton, "undated". "BOND Implementation and Evaluation: 2015 Stage 2 Interim Process, Participation, and Impact Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 933095e3c2b74e388a05cd030, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Marios Michaelides & Peter Mueser, 2018. "Are Reemployment Services Effective? Experimental Evidence from the Great Recession," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 546-570, June.
    4. Zafar E. Nazarov, 2016. "Can Benefits and Work Incentives Counseling be a Path to Future Economic Self-Sufficiency for Individuals with Disabilities?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 211-234, June.
    5. Michelle Derr & Denise Hoffman & Jillian Berk & Ann Person & David Stapleton & Sarah Croake & Christopher Jones & Jonathan McCay, "undated". "BOND Implementation and Evaluation: Process Study Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a3e9aa583058444a943de5034, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. Daniel Gubits & Judy Geyer & Denise Hoffman & Sarah Croake & Utsav Kattel & David Judkins & Stephen Bell & David Stapleton, "undated". "BOND Implementation and Evaluation: 2015 Stage 2 Interim Process, Participation, and Impact Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0fd873d3819144e49a000c346, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. Judy Geyer & Daniel Gubits & Stephen Bell & Tyler Morrill & Denise Hoffman & Sarah Croake & Katie Morrison & David Judkins & David Stapleton, "undated". "BOND Implementation and Evaluation: 2017 Stage 2 Interim Process, Participation, and Impact Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 3200a977680046ed8df3b0e65, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:33:y:2014:i:3:p:623-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.