IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i23-24p4685-4696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive factors of a prolonged length of stay in a community Nursing‐Led unit: A retrospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Zeffiro
  • Gianfranco Sanson
  • John Welton
  • Massimo Maurici
  • Anna Malatesta
  • Luigia Carboni
  • Ercole Vellone
  • Rosaria Alvaro
  • Fabio D’Agostino

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the care provided to patients admitted into a community Nursing‐Led inpatient unit and to identify factors predicting a length of stay exceeding an established threshold. Background Few studies have been conducted to describe the care provided in a Nursing‐Led unit. No studies have investigated factors affecting length of stay in these services. Design Retrospective cohort study. Methods Consecutive patients admitted to a community Nursing‐Led unit between 2009–2015 were enrolled. Sociodemographic, medical and nursing care (diagnoses and activities) variables were collected from electronic health records. Descriptive analysis and a backward stepwise logistic regression model were applied. The study followed the STROBE guidelines. Results The study enrolled 904 patients (mean age: 77.7 years). The most frequent nursing diagnoses were bathing self‐care deficit and impaired physical mobility. The nursing activities most provided were enteral medication administration and vital signs measurement. Approximately 37% of the patients had a length of stay longer than the established threshold. Nine covariates, including being discharged to home, having an impaired memory nursing diagnosis or being treated for advanced wound care, were found to be independent predictors of prolonged length of stay. Variables related to medical conditions did not affect the length‐of‐stay threshold. Conclusions The length of stay in the community Nursing‐Led unit was mainly predicted by conditions related to sociodemographic factors, nursing complexity and functional status. This result confirms that the medical and nursing needs of a community Nursing‐Led unit population substantively differ from those of hospitalised acute patients. Relevance to clinical practice The nursing complexity and related nursing care to be provided may be adopted as a criterion to establish the appropriate length of stay in the community Nursing‐Led unit for each individual patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Zeffiro & Gianfranco Sanson & John Welton & Massimo Maurici & Anna Malatesta & Luigia Carboni & Ercole Vellone & Rosaria Alvaro & Fabio D’Agostino, 2020. "Predictive factors of a prolonged length of stay in a community Nursing‐Led unit: A retrospective cohort study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4685-4696, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4685-4696
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15509
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Livio Garattini & Alessandro Curto & Nick Freemantle, 2016. "Access to primary care in Italy: time for a shake-up?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(2), pages 113-116, March.
    2. Gianfranco Sanson & Ercole Vellone & Mari Kangasniemi & Rosaria Alvaro & Fabio D'Agostino, 2017. "Impact of nursing diagnoses on patient and organisational outcomes: a systematic literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3764-3783, December.
    3. Wei‐Chun Lin & Su‐Chuan Yuan & Jung‐Yien Chien & Shuo‐Chun Weng & Ming‐Chih Chou & Hsien‐Wen Kuo, 2012. "The effects of respiratory training for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomised clinical trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2870-2878, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauro, Marianna & Giancotti, Monica, 2023. "The 2022 primary care reform in Italy: Improving continuity and reducing regional disparities?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Luciana Aimone Gigio & Demetrio Alampi & Enza Maltese & Elena Sceresini, 2024. "The Italian Primary Healthcare System: a macro area comparison," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 867, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Andrea Riganti, 2021. "Containing costs in the Italian local healthcare market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1001-1014, May.
    4. Cesare Liberali & Alessandro Rubino & Alessandro Colombo & Emanuele Antonio Vendramini, 2023. "Verso la riforma della Medicina Generale: conoscersi per rinnovarsi Risultati del questionario relativo alla conoscenza della Medicina Generale e alle sue prospettive future," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(126), pages 185-205.
    5. Livio Garattini & Marco Badinella Martini & Alessandro Nobili, 2023. "General practice in the EU: countries you see, customs you find," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(2), pages 153-156, March.
    6. Livio Garattini & Marco Badinella Martini & Michele Zanetti, 2021. "More room for telemedicine after COVID-19: lessons for primary care?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(2), pages 183-186, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4685-4696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.