IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/mesame/vhtml10.3280-mesa2023-126oa17410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verso la riforma della Medicina Generale: conoscersi per rinnovarsi Risultati del questionario relativo alla conoscenza della Medicina Generale e alle sue prospettive future

Author

Listed:
  • Cesare Liberali
  • Alessandro Rubino
  • Alessandro Colombo
  • Emanuele Antonio Vendramini

Abstract

Il rinnovamento dei sistemi sanitari ? da tempo al centro del dibattito istituzionale e la recente crisi epidemica ne ha acuito la rilevanza. Una riforma della sanit? territoriale sembra ormai improcrastinabile, ed ? essenziale che gli attori del sistema conoscano i propri stakeholder. Si ? voluto, quindi, cambiare il punto di vista provando a indagare la Medicina Generale attraverso gli altri protagonisti del SSN. I corsisti DIAS e DSC della Lombardia hanno risposto a un questionario, validato da un panel di esperti, al fine di indagare le loro conoscenze e prospettive future riguardo la figura del MMG. I risultati offrono molti spunti di riflessione. Le risposte sono state eterogenee, dimostrando una parziale conoscenza della MG e una grande differenza di aspettative sul futuro di questa professione. Esistono per? alcuni fondamentali punti di convergenza, utili per la riorganizzazione delle cure primarie.

Suggested Citation

  • Cesare Liberali & Alessandro Rubino & Alessandro Colombo & Emanuele Antonio Vendramini, 2023. "Verso la riforma della Medicina Generale: conoscersi per rinnovarsi Risultati del questionario relativo alla conoscenza della Medicina Generale e alle sue prospettive future," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(126), pages 185-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2023-126oa17410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=75381&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Livio Garattini & Alessandro Curto & Nick Freemantle, 2016. "Access to primary care in Italy: time for a shake-up?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(2), pages 113-116, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauro, Marianna & Giancotti, Monica, 2023. "The 2022 primary care reform in Italy: Improving continuity and reducing regional disparities?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Luciana Aimone Gigio & Demetrio Alampi & Enza Maltese & Elena Sceresini, 2024. "The Italian Primary Healthcare System: a macro area comparison," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 867, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Livio Garattini & Marco Badinella Martini & Alessandro Nobili, 2023. "General practice in the EU: countries you see, customs you find," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(2), pages 153-156, March.
    4. Andrea Riganti, 2021. "Containing costs in the Italian local healthcare market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1001-1014, May.
    5. Livio Garattini & Marco Badinella Martini & Michele Zanetti, 2021. "More room for telemedicine after COVID-19: lessons for primary care?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(2), pages 183-186, March.
    6. Valentina Zeffiro & Gianfranco Sanson & John Welton & Massimo Maurici & Anna Malatesta & Luigia Carboni & Ercole Vellone & Rosaria Alvaro & Fabio D’Agostino, 2020. "Predictive factors of a prolonged length of stay in a community Nursing‐Led unit: A retrospective cohort study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4685-4696, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2023-126oa17410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=180 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.