IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i17-18p3565-3574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability in birth: A negative capability

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer MacLellan

Abstract

Aim This article explores the literature on women's expectations for birth, the sociocultural context from which these expectations originate and their impact on the interpretation of birth experience. Background Childbirth is associated with specific expectations from women with the potential for dissatisfaction if these expectations are not met. Design This paper presents a systematic analysis of the concept of vulnerability in childbirth. Findings A framework was extracted from the literature that linked the themes of a discourse of control, construction of inadequacy and shame of exposure to explain the sociocultural origin of dominant childbirth expectations in the literature. The experience of vulnerability unique to the birthing event is suggested as exposing the woman to this underlying contextual framework and impacting the interpretation of her birth. Conclusion This synthesis has exposed the transient experience of vulnerability during birth as a significant contributor to the birthing woman's interpretation of the birth and her place within it. Relevance to clinical practice An explanatory framework is offered to clinicians that could increase their awareness of sociocultural and historical factors impacting a woman's expectations for birth. Appreciation of the woman's vulnerability in birth, exposing her to the influence of this framework, can assist clinicians to facilitate a quality birth experience for women. Furthermore, supporting women and midwives to accept this experience of birth vulnerability as a “negative capability,” can facilitate an empowering birth experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer MacLellan, 2020. "Vulnerability in birth: A negative capability," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3565-3574, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3565-3574
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benoit, Cecilia & Zadoroznyj, Maria & Hallgrimsdottir, Helga & Treloar, Adrienne & Taylor, Kara, 2010. "Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 475-481, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toth, Federico, 2015. "Sovereigns under Siege. How the medical profession is changing in Italy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 128-134.
    2. Sofie Theys & Elisa Lust & Maud Heinen & Sofie Verhaeghe & Dimitri Beeckman & Kristof Eeckloo & Simon Malfait & Ann Van Hecke, 2020. "Barriers and enablers for the implementation of a hospital communication tool for patient participation: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1945-1956, June.
    3. Lubi, Kadi & Uibu, Marko & Koppel, Katre & Mets-Oja, Silja, 2020. "The rising impact of civic activism on health policy: The analysis of the closure of smaller obstetric units in Estonia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1239-1244.
    4. McCabe, Katharine, 2016. "Mothercraft: Birth work and the making of neoliberal mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 177-184.
    5. Attanasio, Laura B. & Hardeman, Rachel R., 2019. "Declined care and discrimination during the childbirth hospitalization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 270-277.
    6. Maria Zadoroznyj & Cecilia Benoit & Sarah Berry, 2012. "Motherhood, Medicine & Markets: The Changing Cultural Politics of Postnatal Care Provision," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(3), pages 134-144, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3565-3574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.