IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i15-16p3089-3096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urinary incontinence in stroke survivors – Development of a programme theory

Author

Listed:
  • Myrta Kohler
  • Hanna Mayer
  • Jürg Kesselring
  • Susi Saxer

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop, in an inpatient rehabilitation setting, a programme theory that promotes continence in people who have suffered a stroke. Background Urinary incontinence in stroke survivors impacts the quality of life, rehabilitation outcomes and ultimately incurred costs of the patient. Different approaches are available for developing and testing complex interventions. Design Building a research‐based programme theory. Methods To elaborate the intervention, a guidance for developing a complex intervention for nursing was chosen and the sources that should be considered were defined. Subsequently, a research‐based programme theory was generated that was represented via a theoretical approach logic model. This study was guided by the checklist for reporting theory of change in public health interventions. Results The intervention consists of six parts with three outcome chains on interconnected levels, which are oriented towards patients and nurses. The important aspects of the programme theory are communication, individually tailored measures and the definition of interdisciplinary objectives. Conclusion Developing a programme theory and representing it via a logic model help clarify the initial intervention and ensure that implementation strategies are well thought out. Relevance to clinical practice By employing detailed reflection and using previous research, it is expected that the intervention can be implemented successfully and its effectiveness can be investigated in more depth.

Suggested Citation

  • Myrta Kohler & Hanna Mayer & Jürg Kesselring & Susi Saxer, 2020. "Urinary incontinence in stroke survivors – Development of a programme theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 3089-3096, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:3089-3096
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15345
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margarita Corry & Mike Clarke & Alison E While & Joan Lalor, 2013. "Developing complex interventions for nursing: a critical review of key guidelines," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(17-18), pages 2366-2386, September.
    2. Chien-Ning Tseng & Guey-Shiun Huang & Po-Jui Yu & Meei-Fang Lou, 2015. "A Qualitative Study of Family Caregiver Experiences of Managing Incontinence in Stroke Survivors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Jones, Bobby & Caudill, Barry & Nakaima, April, 2016. "Steps towards incorporating heterogeneities into program theory: A case study of a data-driven approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 88-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Nakaima, April, 2023. "Learning from experiences of evaluators implementing theory-driven evaluations in diverse settings: Building on the contributions of John Mayne," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Jennifer A. Mallow & Laurie A. Theeke & Elliott Theeke & Brian K. Mallow, 2016. "Using Multidisciplinary Focus Groups to Inform the Development of mI SMART: A Nurse-Led Technology Intervention for Multiple Chronic Conditions," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-6, July.
    3. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Nakaima, April, 2020. "Valuing and embracing complexity: How an understanding of complex interventions needs to shape our evaluation capacities building initiatives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Josephine ME Gibson & Lois H Thomas & Joanna J Harrison & Caroline L Watkins & the ICONS Project Team and the ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Groups, 2018. "Stroke survivors’ and carers’ experiences of a systematic voiding programme to treat urinary incontinence after stroke," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2041-2051, May.
    5. Nakaima, April & Sridharan, Sanjeev & Gibson, Rachael, 2023. "Towards an evolutionary approach to learning from assumptions: Lessons from the evaluation of Dancing with Parkinson’s," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:3089-3096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.