IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i11-12p1797-1807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A contribution to the ontology of the Fundamentals of Care framework from a wonder‐based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Finn Thorbjørn Hansen
  • Lene Bastrup Jørgensen

Abstract

Aim and objectives To critically discuss the ontological framework of Fundamentals of Care (FoC), as developed by Uhrenfeldt, et al. (2018), Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27, 3197–3204; to suggest theoretical improvements by taking a wonder‐based approach; and to show how this approach can be applied in healthcare sectors. Background Based on a critical discussion of a discursive study on the ontology of FoC, studies in phenomenology of wonder and two action research projects involving “Wonder Labs,” this article discusses whether the ontology and reflective practices behind FoC can be qualified further by an existential phenomenology of wonder and with practices of “Wonder Labs.” Design This is a discursive study critically discussing Uhrenfeldt et al.'s primary focus on dyadic and relational openness and person‐oriented attentiveness in a nurse–patient relationship. This is done by unfolding the phenomenology of wonder and wonder experiences at a hospice and a hospital, and by critically examining the psychologically influenced interpretation of Heidegger. Conclusion The first attempts by Uhrenfeldt et al. to identify the philosophical roots and ontology of FoC by pointing to existential phenomenology and philosophy are acknowledged. However, in this article, we further elaborate this attempt by focusing on the phenomenology of wonder. We show that Heidegger speaking about “existential homecoming” referred to a philosophical practice focusing on the resonance with being, rather than on interpersonal and psychological relations. In conclusion, the article recognises the importance of integrating these two approaches described on the one hand as a person‐oriented and lifeworld‐led approach, and on the other hand as a being‐ and phenomenon‐oriented approach to the nurse–patient relationship. Relevance to clinical practice To be open to the “musicality” of the being dimension, as the core values of FoC, a wonder‐based approach to value clarifications and phenomenological dialogues is pivotal for the presence of openness, trust and attentiveness of the nurse–patient relationship. The practices of the “Wonder Lab” may be an approach for training nurses in hearing the call of this “ontological resonance.”

Suggested Citation

  • Finn Thorbjørn Hansen & Lene Bastrup Jørgensen, 2020. "A contribution to the ontology of the Fundamentals of Care framework from a wonder‐based approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1797-1807, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:11-12:p:1797-1807
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15272
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eikeland, Olav, 2012. "Action Research – Applied Research, Intervention Research, Collaborative Research, Practitioner Research, or Praxis Research?," International Journal of Action Research, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 8(1), pages 9-44.
    2. Therese Connell Meehan & Fiona Timmins & Jacqueline Burke, 2018. "Fundamental care guided by the Careful Nursing Philosophy and Professional Practice Model©," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2260-2273, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvisa Palese & Jessica Longhini & Matteo Danielis, 2021. "To what extent Unfinished Nursing Care tools coincide with the discrete elements of The Fundamentals of Care Framework? A comparative analysis based on a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 239-265, January.
    2. Crawshaw, Lauren & Fèvre, Sonia & Kaesombath, Lampheuy & Sivilai, Bounlerth & Boulom, Sayvisene & Southammavong, Fongsamouth, 2014. "Lessons from an Integrated Community Health Education Initiative in Rural Laos," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 487-502.
    3. Hansen, Finn Thorbjørn (Хансен, Финн Торбьёрн), 2023. "What Does Apophatic Activism Research Look Like? Learning To Consider The Delicate Issues Of Silence And Surprise In Professional Practice [Как Выглядит Апофатическое Исследование Активности? Учимс," Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 52-65.
    4. Frank Jan Graaf, 2019. "Ethics and Behavioural Theory: How Do Professionals Assess Their Mental Models?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 933-947, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:11-12:p:1797-1807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.