IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1555-1567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain process of patients with cardiac surgery—Semantic annotation of electronic patient record data

Author

Listed:
  • Kristiina Heikkilä
  • Anna Axelin
  • Laura‐Maria Peltonen
  • Juho Heimonen
  • Pauliina Anttila
  • Timo Viljanen
  • Tapio Salakoski
  • Sanna Salanterä

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe and compare the pain process of the patients’ with cardiac surgery through nurses’ and physicians’ documentations in the electronic patient records. Background Postoperative pain assessment and management should be documented regularly, to ensure optimal pain care process for patients. Despite availability of evidence‐based guidelines, pain assessment and documentation remain inadequate. Design A retrospective patients’ record review. Methods The original data consisted of the electronic patient records of 26,922 patients with a diagnosed heart disease. A total of 1,818 care episodes of patients with cardiac surgery were selected from the data. We used random sampling to obtain 280 care episodes for annotation. These 280 care episodes contained 2,156 physician reports and 1,327 days of nursing notes. We developed an annotation manual and schema, and then, we manually conducted semantic annotation on care episodes, using the Brat annotation tool. We analysed the annotation units using thematic analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guideline was followed in reporting where appropriate in this study design. Results We discovered expressions of six different aspects of pain process: (a) cause, (b) situation, (c) features, (d) consequences, (e) actions and (f) outcomes. We determined that five of the aspects existed chronologically. However, the features of pain were simultaneously existing. They indicated the location, quality, intensity, and temporality of the pain and they were present in every phase of the patient’s pain process. Cardiac and postoperative pain documentations differed from each other in used expressions and in the quantity and quality of descriptions. Conclusion We could construct a comprehensive pain process of the patients with cardiac surgery from several electronic patient records. The challenge remains how to support systematic documentation in each patient. Relevance to clinical practice The study provides knowledge and guidance of pain process aspects that can be used to achieve an effective pain assessment and more comprehensive documentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristiina Heikkilä & Anna Axelin & Laura‐Maria Peltonen & Juho Heimonen & Pauliina Anttila & Timo Viljanen & Tapio Salakoski & Sanna Salanterä, 2019. "Pain process of patients with cardiac surgery—Semantic annotation of electronic patient record data," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1555-1567, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1555-1567
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14752
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbro Wadensten & Camilla Fröjd & Christine L Swenne & Torsten Gordh & Lena Gunningberg, 2011. "Why is pain still not being assessed adequately? Results of a pain prevalence study in a university hospital in Sweden," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 624-634, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eirin Sigurdssøn Ludvigsen & Øystein Øygarden Flæten & Caryl L Gay & Magnus TarAngen & Tove Irene Granheim & Anners Lerdal, 2016. "Pain and concomitant symptoms in medical and elective surgical inpatients: a point prevalence survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3229-3240, November.
    2. Julie Gregory & Linda McGowan, 2016. "An examination of the prevalence of acute pain for hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 583-598, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1555-1567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.