IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i5-6p583-598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of the prevalence of acute pain for hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Gregory
  • Linda McGowan

Abstract

Aims and objective Aims of the review were to establish the prevalence of acute pain for adults in hospital, to identify the amount of severe or unacceptable pain reported and to examine the prevalence of acute pain within medical units. Background Acute Pain Services have been established in the United Kingdom (UK) to improve pain management within surgical settings. Acute pain is a common symptom across all hospital settings. However, medical settings have traditionally been considered low risk for acute pain and have therefore not always been included in the provision provided by APS. As a result 82% of APS surveyed in the UK felt that pain management was suboptimal on medical units. Design and method This review follows the process of a systematic review. Results Hospital‐wide pain prevalence obtained ranged from 37·7–84%, severe pain prevalence ranged from 9–36%. The papers reviewed were of variable quality and heterogeneous resulting in the wide range of pain prevalence. Higher prevalence of pain was found for surgical patients compared to medical patients, although up to 55% of medical patients’ reported pain. Conclusion It is difficult to determine a definite prevalence of pain for adults in hospital due to the variability of the studies examined. However, pain does remain a significant symptom with up to 35% of patients reporting severe pain and approximately 50% of medical patient reported pain. Relevance to clinical practice Awareness of the extent of pain as a problem for patients is the first step to improving practice. This review has demonstrated that there is a need for similar Acute Pain Teams and services for the staff and patients admitted to all areas of the hospital, including medical units to help clinicians assess and treat pain in all areas of a hospital setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Gregory & Linda McGowan, 2016. "An examination of the prevalence of acute pain for hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 583-598, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:583-598
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13094
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbro Wadensten & Camilla Fröjd & Christine L Swenne & Torsten Gordh & Lena Gunningberg, 2011. "Why is pain still not being assessed adequately? Results of a pain prevalence study in a university hospital in Sweden," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 624-634, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Luis Pancorbo-Hidalgo & José Carlos Bellido-Vallejo, 2019. "Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Outcome Knowledge: Pain Management in People with Chronic Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eirin Sigurdssøn Ludvigsen & Øystein Øygarden Flæten & Caryl L Gay & Magnus TarAngen & Tove Irene Granheim & Anners Lerdal, 2016. "Pain and concomitant symptoms in medical and elective surgical inpatients: a point prevalence survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3229-3240, November.
    2. Kristiina Heikkilä & Anna Axelin & Laura‐Maria Peltonen & Juho Heimonen & Pauliina Anttila & Timo Viljanen & Tapio Salakoski & Sanna Salanterä, 2019. "Pain process of patients with cardiac surgery—Semantic annotation of electronic patient record data," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1555-1567, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:583-598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.