IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i5-6p997-1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the early‐stage implementation of a patient engagement support intervention in an integrated‐care context—A qualitative study of a participatory process

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Menichetti
  • Giuliana Pitacco
  • Guendalina Graffigna

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore: (a) the usual patient education in different care services of an integrated‐care organisation, (b) the healthcare professionals’ experiences with adding a patient engagement support intervention called PHEinAction in the patient education practice and (c) the co‐designed activities to assist the implementation. Background Including individual support for engaging patients in care into patient education practice is a key effort of integrated‐care organisations. However, there is a paucity of studies exploring the implementation of similar efforts. Design and methods We conducted a qualitative study of a participatory process with 26 healthcare professionals—mostly nurses (n = 22) with leading roles (n = 12)—of different care services in one Italian integrated‐care organisation. Data were collected through multiple sources (observations and shadowing; interviews; documents/artefacts; workshops) during the first 6 months of the implementation of PHEinAction. A thematic analysis using a hybrid approach was performed. COREQ guidelines were followed. Results The existing patient education practice of hospital, ambulatory and community healthcare services of the organisation differed in contents, perceived responsibility and focus area. These key aspects of patient education influenced the healthcare professionals’ experiences with the implementation. The experiences informed the activities enacted during the participatory process to assist the implementation, from the co‐creation of artefacts to the deployment of peer group supervision. Conclusion The implementation of a brief intervention for patient engagement support required a process of adjustment to the single settings and a continuous support to healthcare professionals. It also required performing complementary activities to assist the implementation and its adoption in new care services. Relevance to clinical practice This qualitative study contributes to the understanding of the pitfalls and strategies that may surround embedding patient engagement support in the educational practice of complex organisations, potentially facilitating the deployment to other care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Menichetti & Giuliana Pitacco & Guendalina Graffigna, 2019. "Exploring the early‐stage implementation of a patient engagement support intervention in an integrated‐care context—A qualitative study of a participatory process," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 997-1009, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:997-1009
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14706
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Bruin, Simone R. & Versnel, Nathalie & Lemmens, Lidwien C. & Molema, Claudia C.M. & Schellevis, François G. & Nijpels, Giel & Baan, Caroline A., 2012. "Comprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 108-145.
    2. Cornwall, Andrea & Jewkes, Rachel, 1995. "What is participatory research?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(12), pages 1667-1676, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Chiara Demartini & Valentina Beretta, 2020. "La gestione della cronicit? nelle aziende sanitarie: una rassegna della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(116), pages 7-30.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Patsias & Anne Latendresse & Laurence Bherer, 2013. "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2214-2230, November.
    2. Lauren Arundell & Kate Parker & Jo Salmon & Jenny Veitch & Anna Timperio, 2019. "Informing Behaviour Change: What Sedentary Behaviours Do Families Perform at Home and How Can They Be Targeted?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Mike Kesby, 2007. "Spatialising Participatory Approaches: The Contribution of Geography to a Mature Debate," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(12), pages 2813-2831, December.
    4. Stoop, Annerieke & de Bruin, Simone R. & Wistow, Gerald & Billings, Jenny & Ruppe, Georg & Leichsenring, Kai & Obermann, Konrad & Baan, Caroline A. & Nijpels, Giel, 2019. "Exploring improvement plans of fourteen European integrated care sites for older people with complex needs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1135-1154.
    5. Ines Testoni & Irene Nencioni & Maibrit Arbien & Erika Iacona & Francesca Marrella & Vittoria Gorzegno & Cristina Selmi & Francesca Vianello & Alfonso Nava & Adriano Zamperini & Michael Alexander Wies, 2021. "Mental Health in Prison: Integrating the Perspectives of Prison Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Zemadim, B. & McCartney, Matthew & Langan, Simon & Sharma, Bharat, 2013. "A participatory approach for hydrometeorological monitoring in the Blue Nile River Basin of Ethiopia," IWMI Reports 201009, International Water Management Institute.
    7. Lisa M. Vaughn & MaryAnn Lohmueller, 2014. "Calling All Stakeholders," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 336-355, August.
    8. Ana Luiza Fontenelle & Erik Nilsson & Ieda Geriberto Hidalgo & Cintia B. Uvo & Drielli Peyerl, 2022. "Temporal Understanding of the Water–Energy Nexus: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Azad, Md Javed & Pritchard, Bill, 2022. "Financial capital as a shaper of households' adaptive capabilities to flood risk in northern Bangladesh," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Hopman, Petra & de Bruin, Simone R. & Forjaz, Maria João & Rodriguez-Blazquez, Carmen & Tonnara, Giuseppe & Lemmens, Lidwien C. & Onder, Graziano & Baan, Caroline A. & Rijken, Mieke, 2016. "Effectiveness of comprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions or frailty: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(7), pages 818-832.
    11. Ebitu, Larmbert & Avery, Helen & Mourad, Khaldoon A. & Enyetu, Joshua, 2021. "Citizen science for sustainable agriculture – A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Lena H. A. Raaijmakers & Tjard R. Schermer & Mandy Wijnen & Hester E. van Bommel & Leslie Michielsen & Floris Boone & Jan H. Vercoulen & Erik W. M. A. Bischoff, 2023. "Development of a Person-Centred Integrated Care Approach for Chronic Disease Management in Dutch Primary Care: A Mixed-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, February.
    13. San Sebastián, Miguel & Hurtig, Anna Karin, 2005. "Oil development and health in the Amazon basin of Ecuador: the popular epidemiology process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 799-807, February.
    14. So Pyay Thar & Thiagarajah Ramilan & Robert J. Farquharson & Deli Chen, 2021. "Identifying Potential for Decision Support Tools through Farm Systems Typology Analysis Coupled with Participatory Research: A Case for Smallholder Farmers in Myanmar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Theresia Krieger & Sandra Salm & Antje Dresen & Anna Arning & Kathrin Schwickerath & Andrea Göttel & Stefanie Houwaart & Holger Pfaff & Natalia Cecon, 2022. "Optimizing Patient Information Material for a New Psycho-Oncological Care Program Using a Participatory Health Research Approach in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Jacob D. Tafrate & Kelsey E. Nyland & Robert W. Orttung, 2024. "Constituents over Correlation: Indicators and Arctic Urban Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Bessell, Sharon, 2019. "Money matters…but so do people: Children's views and experiences of living in a ‘disadvantaged’ community," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 59-66.
    18. Sollis, Kate & Yap, Mandy & Campbell, Paul & Biddle, Nicholas, 2022. "Conceptualisations of wellbeing and quality of life: A systematic review of participatory studies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Hollynd Boyden & Mayela Gillan & Javier Molina & Ashok Gadgil & Winston Tseng, 2023. "Community Perceptions of Arsenic Contaminated Drinking Water and Preferences for Risk Communication in California’s San Joaquin Valley," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Bernard Amadei, 2020. "A Systems Approach to Building Community Capacity and Resilience," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:997-1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.