IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i3-4p686-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peripheral intravenous catheter difficulty – A clinical survey of registered nurse and critical care nurse performance

Author

Listed:
  • Åsa Engström
  • Angelica Forsberg

Abstract

Objectives To describe the characteristics, problems and interventions associated with performing peripheral intravenous catheterisation in difficult situations when registered nurses need support from critical care nurses. Background Only a few studies have focused on peripheral intravenous catheterisation problems or interventions to promote success. There is limited research on the education, knowledge, confidence and skills of registered nurses associated with successful peripheral intravenous catheterisations. Design A descriptive cross‐sectional survey design was used. Results A total of 101 questionnaires were completed by critical care nurses (n = 32) and 92 by registered nurses (n = 83); the total number of participants was 115. The same critical care nurses and registered nurses could participate several times on different occasions. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics. The patterns differed in part between the registered nurses who needed support and the critical care nurses who provided the support. Both registered nurses and critical care nurses used ultrasound to a very low extent (2.2% vs. 1.0%). The registered nurses indicated to a significantly higher extent (p = 0.02) that the veins were invisible and that they had performed the optional interventions. The success rate for critical care nurses was considerably high (86.1%). The most common place for successful insertion was the wrist. Critical care nurses performed fewer interventions, and they informed the patients and assessed that the veins were fragile to a higher extent. Conclusions Superior nursing skills are required in order to adapt and assess specific situations related to peripheral intravenous catheterisation difficulties and to choose the adequate interventions. Young and newly graduated registered nurses should be offered individualised training during the post‐educational period on how to assess problems and perform peripheral intravenous catheterisations in specific difficult situations. Relevance to Clinical Practice Simulation is suggested for practical training in order to increase patient safety related to the performance of technical skills such as peripheral intravenous catheterisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Åsa Engström & Angelica Forsberg, 2019. "Peripheral intravenous catheter difficulty – A clinical survey of registered nurse and critical care nurse performance," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 686-694, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:3-4:p:686-694
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14668
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haitham Tuffaha & Claire Rickard & Joan Webster & Nicole Marsh & Louisa Gordon & Marianne Wallis & Paul Scuffham, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Indicated Versus Routine Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 51-58, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michela Piredda & Jacopo Fiorini & Gabriella Facchinetti & Valentina Biagioli & Anna Marchetti & Fabio Conti & Laura Iacorossi & Diana Giannarelli & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Risk factors for a difficult intravenous access: A multicentre study comparing nurses' beliefs to evidence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3492-3504, October.
    2. Tao Wei & Xu‐ying Li & Zhi‐ping Yue & Yong‐yi Chen & Yi‐ren Wang & Zhong Yuan & Qin Lin & Yan Tan & Si‐yi Peng & Xing‐feng Li, 2019. "Catheter dwell time and risk of catheter failure in adult patients with peripheral venous catheters," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4488-4495, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Blanco-Mavillard & Gaizka Parra-García & Ismael Fernández-Fernández & Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Calero & Celia Personat-Labrador & Enrique Castro-Sánchez, 2020. "Care of peripheral intravenous catheters in three hospitals in Spain: Mapping clinical outcomes and implementation of clinical practice guidelines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:3-4:p:686-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.