IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i23-24p4488-4495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catheter dwell time and risk of catheter failure in adult patients with peripheral venous catheters

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Wei
  • Xu‐ying Li
  • Zhi‐ping Yue
  • Yong‐yi Chen
  • Yi‐ren Wang
  • Zhong Yuan
  • Qin Lin
  • Yan Tan
  • Si‐yi Peng
  • Xing‐feng Li

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore whether the risk of peripheral venous catheters failure remained constant throughout catheter use in adult patients. Background Peripheral venous catheters, widely used in adult patients, may have a critical threshold dwell time associated with increased risk of catheter failure. Design Prospective, observational study. We have complied with the STROBE checklist of items. Methods This study was conducted from July–October 2018 in Hunan, China. Data on patient factors, catheter factors and catheter failure events were collected. Poisson regression was used to assess the effect of catheter dwell time on catheter failure while adjusting for other variables. Results A total of 1,477 patients were included in the analysis. There were 854 cases (57.8%) of catheter failure. The median dwell time to catheter failure was 52 hr (interquartile range: 36–73 hr). The incidence rate of catheter failure significantly increased by 1.1%/h in the first 38 hr after catheter insertion. From 39–149 hr, the incidence rate significantly decreased, and at >149 hr, there was no significant change in the incidence rate. Meanwhile, factors such as vascular quality and infused drugs showed having an impact on catheter failure events. Conclusions The risk of catheter failure may not remain constant throughout the dwell time. The results suggest that nurses should assess the insertion site frequently in the first 38 hr. Relevance to clinical practice The significant increase in the risk of catheter failure per hour may warrant close and frequent inspection of insertion site during the first 38 hr.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Wei & Xu‐ying Li & Zhi‐ping Yue & Yong‐yi Chen & Yi‐ren Wang & Zhong Yuan & Qin Lin & Yan Tan & Si‐yi Peng & Xing‐feng Li, 2019. "Catheter dwell time and risk of catheter failure in adult patients with peripheral venous catheters," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4488-4495, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4488-4495
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giancarlo Cicolini & Valentina Simonetti & Dania Comparcini & Sonia Labeau & Stijn Blot & Gilda Pelusi & Pamela Di Giovanni, 2014. "Nurses' knowledge of evidence‐based guidelines on the prevention of peripheral venous catheter‐related infections: a multicentre survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2578-2588, September.
    2. Åsa Engström & Angelica Forsberg, 2019. "Peripheral intravenous catheter difficulty – A clinical survey of registered nurse and critical care nurse performance," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 686-694, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Indre Brasaite & Marja Kaunonen & Arvydas Martinkenas & Vida Mockiene & Tarja Suominen, 2017. "Health Care Professionals’ Knowledge Regarding Patient Safety," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 285-300, June.
    2. Michela Piredda & Jacopo Fiorini & Gabriella Facchinetti & Valentina Biagioli & Anna Marchetti & Fabio Conti & Laura Iacorossi & Diana Giannarelli & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Risk factors for a difficult intravenous access: A multicentre study comparing nurses' beliefs to evidence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3492-3504, October.
    3. Gillian Ray‐Barruel & Christine Woods & Emily N. Larsen & Nicole Marsh & Amanda J. Ullman & Claire M. Rickard, 2019. "Nurses' decision‐making about intravenous administration set replacement: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3786-3795, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4488-4495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.