IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i3-4p677-685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current status and influencing factors of barriers to enteral feeding of critically ill patients: A multicenter study

Author

Listed:
  • Jingying Huang
  • Lili Yang
  • Yiyu Zhuang
  • Haiou Qi
  • Xiangpin Chen
  • Kai Lv

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the barriers in administering enteral feeding to critically ill patients from the nursing perspective. Our objectives are to provide tailored interventions for addressing identified barriers and propose an optimal enteral nutrition (EN) practice in intensive care unit (ICU). Background Despite the availability of numerous verified clinical practice guidelines focusing on enteral feeding of critically ill patients, a wide gap remains between the guideline recommendations and actual nutrition performances. Underfeeding is also a global problem. Therefore, to further understand the reasons of the systemic iatrogenic underfeeding in ICUs, several potential issues are investigated. Design This research is a cross‐sectional descriptive study. Methods A total of 808 nurses were recruited from 10 comprehensive hospitals from different districts in China. The nursing staff demographic, the unit's EN management information and the Chinese version of barriers to enteral feeding critically ill patients questionnaire were the parameters used to collect data via WeChat app. Moreover, the collected data were analysed by descriptive and correlative statistical analysis methods. Results Results obtained by multiple linear regression showed that frequency of EN‐related training, full‐time ICU nutritionist, hospital level, specific protocols for enteral feeding and position were significantly influencing the enteral feeding of ICU patients. Conclusions Enteral feeding barriers of ICU patients are at a moderate level and are influenced by multiple aspects. Hence, hospital departments should strengthen standardisation and systematic EN training, provide ICU full‐time nutritionists and distribute medical resources and personnel rationally. Moreover, construction of a localised feeding process and exerting subjective initiative of clinical nurses from an evidence‐based guideline are important. Multifaceted tailored interventions should be implemented to address these barriers. Relevance to clinical practice The findings of this study can be used to inform future intervention and guidelines aimed at addressing these barriers systematically and improving adherence to critical care nutrition guidelines for the provision of enteral nutrition.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingying Huang & Lili Yang & Yiyu Zhuang & Haiou Qi & Xiangpin Chen & Kai Lv, 2019. "Current status and influencing factors of barriers to enteral feeding of critically ill patients: A multicenter study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 677-685, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:3-4:p:677-685
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14667
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose Chapman & Asheq Rahman & Mary Courtney & Cheyne Chalmers, 2017. "Impact of teamwork on missed care in four Australian hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 170-181, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rania Albsoul & Gerard FitzGerald & Julie Finucane & Erika Borkoles, 2019. "Factors influencing missed nursing care in public hospitals in Australia: An exploratory mixed methods study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1820-1832, October.
    2. Dominika Kalánková & Daniela Bartoníčková & Ewelina Kolarczyk & Katarína Žiaková & Agnieszka Młynarska, 2022. "Factors Contributing to Rationed Nursing Care in the Slovak Republic—A Secondary Analysis of Quantitative Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Pearlyn Qin Ling Goh & Ting Fang Ser & Simon Cooper & Ling Jie Cheng & Sok Ying Liaw, 2020. "Nursing teamwork in general ward settings: A mixed‐methods exploratory study among enrolled and registered nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3802-3811, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:3-4:p:677-685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.