IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i3-4p575-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ perceptions of the root causes of community‐acquired pressure ulcers: Application of the Model for Examining Safety and Quality Concerns in Home Healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline A. McGraw

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how the context of care influences the development of community‐acquired pressure ulcers from the perspective of nurses working in home healthcare settings, to identify and categorise the factors perceived as contributing to the development of these ulcers using the Model for Examining Safety and Quality Concerns in Home Healthcare, and to explore how these risks are managed in practice. Background Pressure ulcer reduction is a priority in both hospital and community settings. Evidence suggests the factors affecting safety and performance in community settings are not the same as in hospital. However, research pertaining to pressure ulcer risk management has predominantly been undertaken in hospital settings. Design The study was framed by a qualitative exploratory design. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 19 registered nurses recruited from an independent regional tissue viability network and five community nursing provider organisations in London. Results The experiences and perceptions of participants mapped onto the components of the Model for Examining Safety and Quality Concerns in Home HealthCare: patient characteristics, provider characteristics, nature of home healthcare tasks, social and community environment, medical devices and new technology, physical environment, and external environment. Four strategies to address identified risks were established: behavioural interventions, technical interventions, safeguarding interventions and initiatives to promote better integration between health, local authorities and families. Conclusion Understanding the complex interplay between people and other elements of the healthcare system is critical to the prevention, management and investigation of pressure ulcers. This study has illuminated these elements from the perspective of nurses working in community settings. Relevance to clinical practice Further consideration should be given to the importance of place when both developing risk management strategies for pressure ulcer prevention and learning the lessons from failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline A. McGraw, 2019. "Nurses’ perceptions of the root causes of community‐acquired pressure ulcers: Application of the Model for Examining Safety and Quality Concerns in Home Healthcare," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 575-588, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:3-4:p:575-588
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14652
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14652?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre M. Rodrigues & Pedro L. Ferreira & Carmen Ferré‐Grau, 2016. "Providing informal home care for pressure ulcer patients: how it affects carers' quality of life and burden," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 3026-3035, October.
    2. Caroline McGraw & Vari M Drennan, 2015. "Evaluation of the suitability of root cause analysis frameworks for the investigation of community‐acquired pressure ulcers: a systematic review and documentary analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 536-545, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirna Žulec & Danica Rotar-Pavlič & Zrinka Puharić & Ana Žulec, 2019. "“Wounds Home Alone”—Why and How Venous Leg Ulcer Patients Self-Treat Their Ulcer: A Qualitative Content Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Ciasullo, Maria Vincenza & Orciuoli, Francesco & Douglas, Alexander & Palumbo, Rocco, 2022. "Putting Health 4.0 at the service of Society 5.0: Exploratory insights from a pilot study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Duncan Smith & Mandeep Sekhon & Jill J. Francis & Leanne M. Aitken, 2019. "How actionable are staff behaviours specified in policy documents? A document analysis of protocols for managing deteriorating patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 4139-4149, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:3-4:p:575-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.