IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p3026-3035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Providing informal home care for pressure ulcer patients: how it affects carers' quality of life and burden

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre M. Rodrigues
  • Pedro L. Ferreira
  • Carmen Ferré‐Grau

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the quality of life of informal caregivers of patients with pressure ulcer; to assess their levels of burden; to analyse the variables influencing both their quality of life and burden. Background Informal caregivers of pressure ulcer patients, besides coping with the natural dependency of these patients, deal with the specificity of caring these types of wounds. This situation has an impact on not only the quality of life and burden felt by informal caregivers but also on individual and familiar dynamics. Design Descriptive and correlational study. Methods This study focused on 145 informal caregivers providing home care. Measurement instruments were: SF‐36v2 and the Burden Interview Scale. Descriptive analysis of the quantitative variables was carried out according to measures of central tendency, and the qualitative variables were described using absolute and relative frequencies. The relationships or associations between variables were explored through correlational analysis and, whenever the data allowed, multivariate techniques were used. Results and discussion Informal caregivers showed low levels of quality of life and, most of them, significant burden. Quality of life decreased with overload, with the increasing number of pressure ulcer and with less experience of informal caregivers, with lack of financial remuneration, with unemployment, with patient positioning and with the direct care of the wound. The burden increased with the number of pressure ulcer in each patient and with the lack of financial remuneration. Conclusion These informal caregivers have low quality of life and are overburdened. Both situations are positively and negatively influenced by factors related to the pressure ulcer and to the patients' sociodemographic data. Relevance to clinical practice The results of this study allow more effective monitoring by health professionals of levels of burden and quality of life encountered in pressure ulcer informal caregivers, as well as direct interventions to inhibit the factors inducing burden and enhance those that improve quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre M. Rodrigues & Pedro L. Ferreira & Carmen Ferré‐Grau, 2016. "Providing informal home care for pressure ulcer patients: how it affects carers' quality of life and burden," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 3026-3035, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:3026-3035
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13356
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirna Žulec & Danica Rotar-Pavlič & Zrinka Puharić & Ana Žulec, 2019. "“Wounds Home Alone”—Why and How Venous Leg Ulcer Patients Self-Treat Their Ulcer: A Qualitative Content Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Ciasullo, Maria Vincenza & Orciuoli, Francesco & Douglas, Alexander & Palumbo, Rocco, 2022. "Putting Health 4.0 at the service of Society 5.0: Exploratory insights from a pilot study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Caroline A. McGraw, 2019. "Nurses’ perceptions of the root causes of community‐acquired pressure ulcers: Application of the Model for Examining Safety and Quality Concerns in Home Healthcare," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 575-588, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:3026-3035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.