IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i23-24p4549-4559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing well‐being in clinical nurses: A path analysis using a multi‐mediation model

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Reul Kim
  • Ok Lae Park
  • Hye Young Kim
  • Ji Young Kim

Abstract

Aims and objectives To test a hypothetical path model estimating the influence of resilience and gratitude disposition on well‐being in Korean clinical nurses and to verify the mediating effects of burnout, compassion satisfaction and job satisfaction using a multi‐mediation model. Background To improve the well‐being of nurses, it is necessary to consider their personal and work‐related characteristics comprehensively. Design A descriptive cross‐sectional design was used. Methods A total of 310 clinical nurses participated in this study. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data. A path analysis using a multi‐mediation model was performed using AMOS 23.0 to test the hypothetical path model. This study adhered to the STROBE guideline. Results The model's fit indices were adequate. Resilience and gratitude disposition both had significant direct effects on well‐being. Resilience and gratitude disposition had significant indirect effects on well‐being through the effect of burnout, compassion satisfaction and job satisfaction. Resilience, gratitude disposition, burnout, compassion satisfaction and job satisfaction explained 68.3% of the total variance of well‐being. Conclusions Intervention programmes considering these factors may be useful to improve nurses’ well‐being. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses’ well‐being should be assessed along with resilience, gratitude disposition, burnout, compassion satisfaction and job satisfaction. To improve the well‐being of clinical nurses, systematic and integrated intervention programmes need to be developed and applied, with consideration for a variety of factors related to well‐being.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Reul Kim & Ok Lae Park & Hye Young Kim & Ji Young Kim, 2019. "Factors influencing well‐being in clinical nurses: A path analysis using a multi‐mediation model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4549-4559, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4549-4559
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15045
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey J. Burnett Jr., 2017. "Revisiting the Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, Compassion Satisfaction, and Resilience Connection Among CISM Responders," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhihui Jia & Xiaotong Wen & Xiaohui Lin & Yixiang Lin & Xuyang Li & Guoqing Li & Zhaokang Yuan, 2021. "Working Hours, Job Burnout, and Subjective Well-Being of Hospital Administrators: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Tertiary Public Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inbar Livnat & Michal Almog-Bar, 2023. "Who Provides Resilience to the Community Resilience Providers?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4549-4559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.