IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i21-22p3923-3934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Situation awareness and the decision‐making processes of final‐year nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Tower
  • Bernadette Watson
  • Alison Bourke
  • Emma Tyers
  • Anne Tin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate final‐year nursing students' use of situation awareness when making clinical decisions about patients' progress postsurgery. Background Making clinical decisions about patient care is a generic nursing competence, developed in preregistration nursing programmes and critical to providing safe patient care. Situation awareness is an important precursor to making decisions and is linked to improved clinical outcomes. However, there is evidence to suggest that nursing students feel inadequately prepared to make clinical decisions. Design Endsley's (Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000) 3‐level situation awareness framework was used to guide the study. Level 1 situation awareness is perception of information required to make a decision. Level 2 relates to comprehending the information. Level 3 situation awareness is projecting how this information will inform the future. Twelve final‐year nursing students were recruited to participate. Think‐aloud research method was used to capture students' decision‐making, followed by semi‐structured interviews. Data were analysed using an adapted protocol analysis and were encoded inductively. The COREQ checklist has been used in reporting the study. Results Students demonstrated level 1, 2 and 3 situation awareness when making clinical decisions. However, it was not demonstrated consistently and at times subsequent decision‐making was inappropriate. Three themes emerged: “systems approach to assessment of postoperative patients”; “policy drives practice”; and “deferring decisions to registered nurses”. Within the themes, students demonstrated differing levels of situation awareness. Conclusion Making safe clinical decisions is a paramount skill for nurses; however, student nurses are ill‐equipped to undertake this skill. Situation awareness is important in informing safe decision‐making, but students' use of situation awareness is variable. Cognitive apprenticeship, applied to supporting development of situation awareness, affords the opportunity to develop students' decision‐making. Relevance to clinical practice Clinical decision‐making is a generic competence for all registered nurses and imperative for safe practice. However, student nurses are unprepared to undertake this skill once registered.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Tower & Bernadette Watson & Alison Bourke & Emma Tyers & Anne Tin, 2019. "Situation awareness and the decision‐making processes of final‐year nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3923-3934, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3923-3934
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14988
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Canova & Giorgio Brogiato & Gabriele Roveron & Renzo Zanotti, 2016. "Changes in decision‐making among Italian nurses and nursing students over the last 15 years," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 811-818, March.
    2. Christine W. Nibbelink & Barbara B. Brewer, 2018. "Decision‐making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 917-928, March.
    3. Simon Cooper & Leigh Kinsman & Penny Buykx & Tracy McConnell‐Henry & Ruth Endacott & Julie Scholes, 2010. "Managing the deteriorating patient in a simulated environment: nursing students’ knowledge, skill and situation awareness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2309-2318, August.
    4. Melanie S Yeung & Stephen E Lapinsky & John T Granton & Diane M Doran & Joseph A Cafazzo, 2012. "Examining nursing vital signs documentation workflow: barriers and opportunities in general internal medicine units," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 975-982, April.
    5. Clint Douglas & Catriona Booker & Robyn Fox & Carol Windsor & Sonya Osborne & Glenn Gardner, 2016. "Nursing physical assessment for patient safety in general wards: reaching consensus on core skills," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 1890-1900, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolina Farčić & Ivana Barać & Robert Lovrić & Stana Pačarić & Zvjezdana Gvozdanović & Vesna Ilakovac, 2020. "The Influence of Self-Concept on Clinical Decision-Making in Nurses and Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Jonas Preposi Cruz & Meshrif Ahmad Bashtawi & Khalid Obaid Almutairi & Regie B. Tumala, 2021. "Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Competence and Attitudes towards Vital Signs Monitoring during Clinical Practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 664-675, March.
    3. Patricia L. Hart & LeeAnna Spiva & Lonnie Dolly & Kristen Lang‐Coleman & Nadia Prince‐Williams, 2016. "Medical‐surgical nurses' experiences as first responders during deterioration events: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3241-3251, November.
    4. Doug Elliott & Emily Allen & Sharon McKinley & Lin Perry & Christine Duffield & Margaret Fry & Robyn Gallagher & Rick Iedema & Michael Roche, 2016. "User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2211-2222, August.
    5. Cristina Lavareda Baixinho & Óscar Ferreira & Marcelo Medeiros & Ellen Synthia Fernandes de Oliveira, 2022. "From Evidence Synthesis to Transfer: Results from a Qualitative Case Study with the Perspectives of Participants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Chiara Dall’Ora & Peter Griffiths & Joanna Hope & Hannah Barker & Gary B Smith, 2020. "What is the nursing time and workload involved in taking and recording patients’ vital signs? A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2053-2068, July.
    7. Bernice Redley & Tim Baker, 2019. "Have you SCAND MMe Please? A framework to prevent harm during acute hospitalisation of older persons: A retrospective audit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 560-574, February.
    8. Alvisa Palese & Jessica Longhini & Angela Businarolo & Tiziana Piccin & Giuliana Pitacco & Livia Bicego, 2021. "Between Restrictive and Supportive Devices in the Context of Physical Restraints: Findings from a Large Mixed-Method Study Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, December.
    9. David Luna-Aleixos & Irene Llagostera-Reverter & Ximo Castelló-Benavent & Marta Aquilué-Ballarín & Gema Mecho-Montoliu & Águeda Cervera-Gasch & María Jesús Valero-Chillerón & Desirée Mena-Tudela & Lau, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part I)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Marina Bădileanu & Ileana Paula Ionel & Justin Aurelian & Daniel Alin Cristian & Cornelia Jude & Luminița-Izabell Georgescu & Ivona Răpan, 2022. "Perception and Deception in Nurses’ Clinical and Work-Related Professional Autonomy: Case Study for a Hospital in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. The‐Phung To & Gillian Dunnachie & Jo‐anne Brien & David A. Story, 2019. "Surgical nurses' perceptions and experiences of a medications and oral restrictions policy change: A focus group study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3242-3251, September.
    12. Carol Della Ratta, 2016. "Challenging graduate nurses' transition: Care of the deteriorating patient," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 3036-3048, October.
    13. Claire Foley & Maura Dowling, 2019. "How do nurses use the early warning score in their practice? A case study from an acute medical unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1183-1192, April.
    14. Oboshie Anim-Boamah & Christmal Dela Christmals & Susan Jennifer Armstrong, 2022. "The Clinical Nursing Competency Assessment System of Ghana: Perspectives of Key Informants," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    15. Ricardo M Padilla & Ann M Mayo, 2018. "Clinical deterioration: A concept analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1360-1368, April.
    16. Qazi, Atika & Qazi, Javaria & Naseer, Khulla & Zeeshan, Muhammad & Qazi, Shiza & Abayomi-Alli, Olusola & Said Ahmad, Ibrahim & Darwich, Mohammad & Ali Talpur, Bandeh & Hardaker, Glenn & Naseem, Usman , 2021. "Adaption of distance learning to continue the academic year amid COVID-19 lockdown," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Dianne C Marshall & Mary P Finlayson, 2018. "Identifying the nontechnical skills required of nurses in general surgical wards," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1475-1487, April.
    18. Sunyoung Oh & Minkyung Gu & Sohyune Sok, 2022. "A Concept Analysis of Nurses’ Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
    19. Jan Neugebauer & Valérie Tóthová & Jitka Doležalová, 2021. "Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-11, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3923-3934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.