IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i17-18p3065-3076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussing sexuality in health care: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Reginald Fennell
  • Blair Grant

Abstract

Aims and objectives Using the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted to explore current and relevant evidence regarding factors that influence nurses’ provision of sexual healthcare education to patients. Background The World Health Organization and Healthy People 2020 emphasise the importance of sexual health care. Although the nursing profession has the ability to develop a competent level of sexuality education, sexual health care is often ignored in nursing care and education. Many nurses are failing to engage in meaningful conversations about sexual health with patients, and this could lead to negative health events. However, patients would like reliable and nonjudgmental access to education about sexual health. Design Electronic databases were searched for articles published between 2012–2017. Studies of nurses providing sexual health education in healthcare settings were included. The Melnyk and Fineout‐Overholt (2015, Evidence‐based practice in nursing & healthcare, Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer) quality assessment framework was used. The researchers independently reviewed 532 studies and agreed upon ten to include in this review. Results Findings from this systematic review suggest that nurses’ provision of sexual health education to patients is influenced by four factors: (a) a lack of knowledge about sexual health, (b) nurses’ attitudes and beliefs that sexual health care is private and not a priority, (c) nurses’ comfort discussing sexual health, and (d) perceived barriers related to time, responsibility and organisational support. Conclusion The ten articles reviewed were all Level VI descriptive and qualitative studies, as defined by Melnyk and Fineout‐Overholt (2015). It is evident that sexual healthcare information is not being widely addressed. To reduce stigma, the positive aspects of sexual health care must be promoted on multiple levels. Relevance to clinical practice Leaders in professional and community‐based organizations should be on the forefront of making recommendations for nurses and practitioners, so they could improve their ability to provide sexual healthcare information to their patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Reginald Fennell & Blair Grant, 2019. "Discussing sexuality in health care: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3065-3076, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:17-18:p:3065-3076
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14900
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Su‐Ching Sung & Huey‐Hwa Jiang & Ru‐Rong Chen & Jian‐Kang Chao, 2016. "Bridging the gap in sexual healthcare in nursing practice: implementing a sexual healthcare training programme to improve outcomes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2989-3000, October.
    2. Cheng‐Yi Huang & Li‐Ya Tsai & Tsui‐Hwa Tseng & Chi‐Rong Li & Sheuan Lee, 2013. "Nursing students’ attitudes towards provision of sexual health care in clinical practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3577-3586, December.
    3. Charles T Yingling & Karen Cotler & Tonda L Hughes, 2017. "Building nurses’ capacity to address health inequities: incorporating lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender health content in a family nurse practitioner programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2807-2817, September.
    4. Kicki Klaeson & Lina Hovlin & Hanna Guvå & Anna Kjellsdotter, 2017. "Sexual health in primary health care – a qualitative study of nurses’ experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1545-1554, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonia García-Duarte & Bruno José Nievas-Soriano & Natalia Fischer-Suárez & Gracia Castro-Luna & Tesifón Parrón-Carreño & Gabriel Aguilera-Manrique, 2023. "Quality of Sexuality during Pregnancy, We Must Do Something—Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Mónica Rojas-Chaves & Manuel Lucas-Matheu & Gracia Castro-Luna & Tesifón Parrón-Carreño & Bruno José Nievas-Soriano, 2022. "Validation of a Scale on Society’s Attitudes towards the Sexuality of Women with Intellectual Disabilities—Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Javier Ramírez-Santos & Gracia Castro-Luna & Manuel Lucas-Matheu & Tesifón Parrón-Carreño & Bruno José Nievas-Soriano, 2022. "Competence and Attitude of Family Physicians towards Sexuality Regarding Their Sexual Orientation, Age, or Having a Partner—Survey Study and Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheryl Zlotnick & Carmit‐Noa Shpigelman, 2018. "A 5‐step framework to promote nursing community inclusivity: The example of nurses with disabilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3787-3796, October.
    2. Emma Pascale Blakey & Helen Aveyard, 2017. "Student nurses’ competence in sexual health care: A literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3906-3916, December.
    3. Federica Dellafiore & Rosario Caruso & Michela Cossu & Sara Russo & Irene Baroni & Serena Barello & Ida Vangone & Marta Acampora & Gianluca Conte & Arianna Magon & Alessandro Stievano & Cristina Arrig, 2022. "The State of the Evidence about the Family and Community Nurse: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Jesús Manuel García-Acosta & Maria Elisa Castro-Peraza & Ángeles Arias Rodriguez & María Luisa Perez-Cánovas & Maria Inmaculada Sosa-Alvarez & Rosa Llabrés-Solé & Ana María Perdomo-Hernández & Nieves , 2019. "Impact of a Formative Program on Transgender Healthcare for Nursing Students and Health Professionals. Quasi-Experimental Intervention Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:17-18:p:3065-3076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.