'Hands‐off/poised' or 'Hands‐on' method among Chinese midwives: A cross‐sectional survey

Aims and objectives To determine midwives' preference for “Hands‐on” and “Hands‐off/poised” methods and to explore the impact factors. Background With the increasing rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries, great controversy surrounds the “Hands‐on” or “Hands‐off” method during childbirth to decrease obstetric anal sphincter injuries incidence. Without regular records and related research, determining the use of this technique in China is difficult. Design This study used a quantitative study design, following the EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE). Methods A nationwide cross‐sectional online survey was conducted using respondent‐driven sampling across 31 provinces in China from 1st October 2017–31st December 2017. A total of 6,425 midwives were involved. Descriptive analyses, chi‐square test and binary logistic regression were undertaken. Results A total of 5,225 questionnaires were returned; 55.8% of the participants preferred the “Hands‐off/poised” method. The impact factors included hospital categories, total work experience in a birth unit in years, theoretical education and skill training. In the study, for situations with increased OASI risk, 100% of the midwives in the “Hands‐off” group expressed willingness to change to the “Hands‐on” method whether there was concern about impending obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Conclusion The “Hands‐off/poised” method is heavily practised by Chinese midwives. However, majority of the midwives adopt “Hands‐on” method in the face of high risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Further studies are needed to determine the association between obstetric anal sphincter injuries rate and perineal management for low‐risk birth. Relevance to clinical practice The result indirectly illustrates the application of “Hands‐off/poised” technique in China and provides evidence for the international midwifery organisation to understand the status of Chinese midwifery to some extent. It also provides the latest data for further study of these two methods and the study of the relationship between hands‐off/poised method and obstetric anal sphincter injuries.