IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i1-2p159-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mentoring up: A grounded theory of nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring

Author

Listed:
  • Regina L. Hale
  • Carolyn A. Phillips

Abstract

Aims and objectives To generate a theoretical explanation of nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring in the clinical setting. Background Despite an abundance of mentoring literature, the processes involved between nurses in mentoring relationships have yet to be studied. Nursing literature has focused on mentor attributes and relationship outcomes rather than focusing on theoretical discovery. Design Classical grounded theory (CGT). Methods CGT procedures (constant comparative method, coding and memoing) were used to analyse interview data exploring fifteen nurse protégés’ experiences of mentoring. Results Confidencing, the protégés’ need to become confident in the professional role, emerged as the main concern of study participants. Three dimensions are threaded throughout nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring: earnest intentions, filial bond and trust‐worthiness. Earnest intentions are the sincere attitude that protégés and mentors demonstrate regarding their mentoring relationship. An exclusive, familial‐type connection, filial bond, attends to the affective needs of protégés and mentors. Trust‐worthiness, the explicit feeling of trust between protégés and mentors, strengthens as each demonstrates being worthy of the other's trust. Mentoring Up theory explains five phases of mentoring: seeding, opening, laddering, equalising and reframing. The initial phases are periods of relationship discovery (seeding) and testing (opening). Laddering is an intense period of reciprocal interactions between mentors and protégés. Equalising begins as protégés perceive themselves to be equal to their mentors in terms of their professional capability. Protégés reflect on the meaning of the relationship in the reframing phase. Conclusions Mentoring Up is a dense theory that reveals insights, explanations and predictions for initiating, developing and engaging in mentoring relationships. Mentoring Up fills a gap in the existing literature and provides a framework for future mentoring research. Relevance to clinical practice The theory has implications for healthcare organisations, nursing education and individual nurses. Mentoring Up expounds on the interpersonal connections and reciprocal interactions vital for successful nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Regina L. Hale & Carolyn A. Phillips, 2019. "Mentoring up: A grounded theory of nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 159-172, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:159-172
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annette Ryan & Lisa Goldberg & Joan Evans, 2010. "Wise women: mentoring as relational learning in perinatal nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 183-191, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucyna Iwanow & Mariusz Jaworski & Joanna Gotlib & Mariusz Panczyk, 2021. "A Model of Factors Determining Nurses’ Attitudes towards Learning Communicative Competences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darlaine Jantzen, 2019. "Refining nursing practice through workplace learning: A grounded theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2565-2576, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:159-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.