IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i9-10p2083-2097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare providers’ perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study

Author

Listed:
  • Pavneet Singh
  • Shelley Raffin‐Bouchal
  • Susan McClement
  • Thomas F Hack
  • Kelli Stajduhar
  • Neil A Hagen
  • Aynharan Sinnarajah
  • Harvey M Chochinov
  • Shane Sinclair

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore healthcare provider perspectives and experiences of perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion. Background Compassion is considered a component of quality health care that healthcare providers are increasingly expected to provide. While there have been some studies exploring facets of healthcare providers’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to providing compassion, a comprehensive understanding based on direct reports from healthcare providers is lacking. Design Data were collected via focus groups and semi‐structured interviews. Data was analyzed in accordance with Straussian grounded theory. Methods Semistructured focus groups with frontline healthcare providers and individual interviews with peer‐nominated exemplary compassionate care providers were audio‐recorded, professionally transcribed and analysed. Fifty‐seven participants were recruited from three healthcare settings within both rural and urban settings in Alberta, Canada, using convenience, snowball and theoretical sampling. Results Qualitative analysis of the data generated two categories and associated themes and subthemes delineating perceived barriers and facilitators to compassion. The first category, challenges to compassion, reflects participants’ discomfort associating the notion of barriers to compassion and contained several themes participants conceptualised as challenges: personal challenges, relational challenges, systemic challenges and maladaptive responses. The second category, facilitators of compassion, included the themes of personal facilitators, relational facilitators, systemic facilitators and adaptive responses of intentional action. Conclusion Although participants described certain factors such as system and time constraints along with interaction styles of patients and families that can challenge healthcare provider compassion, these challenges were not considered insurmountable. While acknowledging these as challenges, participants identified healthcare providers themselves, including their responses towards the identified challenges of compassion, as significant factors in this process—a novel finding from this study. This study provides insight into healthcare providers’ perspectives on the notion of barriers and facilitators in the provision of compassion. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides a blueprint for optimising compassion on a personal, relational and system level.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavneet Singh & Shelley Raffin‐Bouchal & Susan McClement & Thomas F Hack & Kelli Stajduhar & Neil A Hagen & Aynharan Sinnarajah & Harvey M Chochinov & Shane Sinclair, 2018. "Healthcare providers’ perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2083-2097, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2083-2097
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14357
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothy Horsburgh & Janis Ross, 2013. "Care and compassion: the experiences of newly qualified staff nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(7-8), pages 1124-1132, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. E. M. Liljas & N. K. Jensen & J. Pulkki & I. Andersen & I. Keskimäki & B. Burström & J. Agerholm, 2022. "The influence of sociodemographic factors and close relatives at hospital discharge and post hospital care of older people with complex care needs: nurses’ perceptions on health inequity in three Nord," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 189-200, June.
    2. Anett Skorpen Tarberg & Bodil J. Landstad & Torstein Hole & Morten Thronæs & Marit Kvangarsnes, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences of compassionate care in the palliative pathway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4818-4826, December.
    3. Viviana Davalos-Batallas & Ana-Magdalena Vargas-Martínez & Patricia Bonilla-Sierra & Fatima Leon-Larios & Maria-de-las-Mercedes Lomas-Campos & Silvia-Libertad Vaca-Gallegos & Rocio de Diego-Cordero, 2020. "Compassionate Engagement and Action in the Education for Health Care Professions: A Cross-Sectional Study at an Ecuadorian University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær, 2021. "Newly graduated nurses’ socialisation resulting in limiting inquiry and one‐sided use of knowledge sources—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 701-711, March.
    2. Jacinta Kelly, 2014. "Commentary on Horsburgh D and Ross J (2013) Care and compassion: experiences of newly qualified staff nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing 22, 1124–1132," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2382-2383, August.
    3. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Mette Grønkjær & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Newly graduated nurses’ use of knowledge sources in clinical decision‐making: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1313-1327, May.
    4. Viviana Davalos-Batallas & Ana-Magdalena Vargas-Martínez & Patricia Bonilla-Sierra & Fatima Leon-Larios & Maria-de-las-Mercedes Lomas-Campos & Silvia-Libertad Vaca-Gallegos & Rocio de Diego-Cordero, 2020. "Compassionate Engagement and Action in the Education for Health Care Professions: A Cross-Sectional Study at an Ecuadorian University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Graham McCaffrey & Shelagh McConnell, 2015. "Compassion: a critical review of peer‐reviewed nursing literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 3006-3015, October.
    6. Paul Crawford & Brian Brown & Marit Kvangarsnes & Paul Gilbert, 2014. "The design of compassionate care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3589-3599, December.
    7. Joanne Durkin & Kim Usher & Debra Jackson, 2019. "Embodying compassion: A systematic review of the views of nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1380-1392, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2083-2097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.