IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1627-e1639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguous loss and post‐traumatic growth: Experiences of mothers whose school‐aged children were born extremely prematurely

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Wilson
  • Catherine Cook

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop insight into the experiences of mothers whose school‐aged children were born extremely prematurely. Background Extreme prematurity, where infants are born at 28 weeks or earlier, has significant initial maternal impact in terms of distress, uncertainty and disruption to maternal identity. However, little is known about the experiences of these mothers beyond their child's infancy. Design A qualitative study was undertaken using thematic analysis, drawing on a cluster of social constructionist theories that have been applied to studies investigating mothers’ early preterm or childhood disability experiences. Methods The study involved face‐to‐face interviews with nine mothers whose children were born prior to 28 weeks and were now aged between 4‐to‐7 years old. Results Participants described a prolonged period of anxiety, and relative isolation due to infection fears and complex care regimes. Although they grieved their different mothering trajectory, they celebrated their children's successes and noted their own resilience. The following themes were identified: traumatic beginnings; dialectics and the horror‐miracle contradiction; labour‐intensive parenting and managing the multidisciplinary team; stigma and storying the meaning of premature birth; and impact on relationships. Conclusions Women's vulnerability and resilience are evident long after the birth of an extremely prematurely born infant. Women value connection with similar mothers, and yet finding community is often daunting due to their children's early complex needs. Generalist healthcare providers may be unaware of the experiences these mothers have endured, and need to enquire about their well‐being. Relevance to clinical practice The lives of mothers of extremely preterm infants may take years to merge with the world of those mothers who parent healthy, term infants. Neonatal nurses and those in primary health care are well placed to notice signs of isolation, depression and anxiety, and to support and refer women appropriately.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Wilson & Catherine Cook, 2018. "Ambiguous loss and post‐traumatic growth: Experiences of mothers whose school‐aged children were born extremely prematurely," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1627-1639, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1627-e1639
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14319
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirkman, Maggie, 2003. "Parents' contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 2229-2242, December.
    2. Jan-Marc Hodek & J-Matthias von der Schulenburg & Thomas Mittendorf, 2011. "Measuring economic consequences of preterm birth - Methodological recommendations for the evaluation of personal burden on children and their caregivers," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Ryan, Kath & Bissell, Paul & Alexander, Jo, 2010. "Moral work in women's narratives of breastfeeding," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 951-958, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomori, Cecilia & Palmquist, Aunchalee E.L. & Dowling, Sally, 2016. "Contested moral landscapes: Negotiating breastfeeding stigma in breastmilk sharing, nighttime breastfeeding, and long-term breastfeeding in the U.S. and the U.K," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 178-185.
    2. Sunna Símonardóttir, 2016. "Getting the Green Light: Experiences of Icelandic Mothers Struggling with Breastfeeding," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 82-94, November.
    3. Jacqueline Elizabeth van Wijlen, 2019. "Breastfeeding woman or lactating object? A critical philosophical discussion on the influence of Cartesian dualism on breastfeeding in the neonatal intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 1022-1031, March.
    4. Kestler-Peleg, Miri & Shamir-Dardikman, Merav & Hermoni, Doron & Ginzburg, Karni, 2015. "Breastfeeding motivation and Self-Determination Theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 19-27.
    5. Hosein Dalili & Mohaddese Fallahi & Saeid Moradi & Fatemeh Nayeri & Mamak Shariat & Arash Rashidian, 2014. "Clinical outcome and cost of treatment and care for neonates less than 1000 grams admitted to Vali-e ASR Hospital," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Christabel C Enweronu-Laryea & Hilary D Andoh & Audrey Frimpong-Barfi & Francis M Asenso-Boadi, 2018. "Parental costs for in-patient neonatal services for perinatal asphyxia and low birth weight in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Braimoh, Jessica & Davies, Lorraine, 2014. "When ‘breast’ is no longer ‘best’: Post-partum constructions of infant-feeding in the hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 82-89.
    8. Robyn Lee, 2018. "Breastfeeding Bodies: Intimacies at Work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 77-90, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1627-e1639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.